Howard v. Dzurenda et al
Filing
6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that it is necessary in this procedural context, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
REGINALD C. HOWARD,
10
Case No. 2:17-cv-00573-GMN-PAL
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11
JAMES DZURENDA, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
Petitioner Reginald C. Howard has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas
15
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 10, 2017, the court directed Howard to
16
show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as untimely (ECF No. 3). The
17
order directed that Howard file his response within thirty (30) days. Id. The order was
18
served on Howard via U.S. mail at his address of record.
19
More than the allotted time to respond to this court’s show-cause order has
20
passed, and Howard has failed to respond in any way. Accordingly, this action shall be
21
dismissed with prejudice.
22
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED with prejudice.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that it is necessary in this procedural
24
context, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case.
26
DATED: 12 October 2017.
27
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?