Ortiz v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Filing
6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 24, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 03/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
EDGAR ORTIZ,
7
8
9
10
11
12
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:17-cv-00580-JAD-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
13
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed February 23,
14
2017. LR 7.1-1 requires that pro se parties and attorneys for private non-governmental parties must,
15
upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships
16
or corporations, known to have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case, including the
17
names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there
18
are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect
19
must be filed. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
20
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully
21
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 24, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance
22
of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
23
DATED this 17th day of March, 2017.
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?