Rohde v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Filing 15

ORDER Denying 14 Stipulation re Confidentiality Agreement. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/16/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 RANDY ROHDE, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant(s). ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:17-cv-00620-GMN-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 14) 16 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated protective order. Docket No. 14. Read 17 literally, the stipulated protective order would subject the Court and its staff to civil liability for any 18 disclosure of confidential information if contrary to the terms of the stipulated protective order. See id. 19 at ¶ 14; see also id. at ¶ 3(d) (identifying Court officials as “qualified persons”). This is problematic for 20 numerous reasons. First, the Court has its own duty to apply Ninth Circuit standards to unseal materials 21 as appropriate even though those materials may have been designated as confidential pursuant to the 22 stipulated protective order. See, e.g., Florence v. Cenlar Fed. Savings & Loan, 2017 WL 1078637, at 23 *4 n.5 (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2017) (the mere fact that a document is designated confidential pursuant to a 24 stipulated protective order does not ensure the Court will maintain that document under seal once filed).1 25 Second, Court officials are absolutely immune from civil liability in conjunction with exercising judicial 26 functions. See, e.g., Burton v. Infinity Capital Mgmt., 862 F.3d 740, 747-48 (9th Cir. 2017) (discussing 27 28 1 The stipulated protective order implicitly acknowledges this elsewhere. See Docket No. 14 at ¶ 17. 1 reach of absolute judicial immunity). Accordingly, the Court declines to enter the parties’ proposed 2 stipulated protective order in its current form, and it is hereby DENIED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: August 16, 2017 5 6 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?