JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Stipulation; Re: 44 Motion for Summary Judgment, 42 Motion for Summary Judgment, 40 Motion for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 2/28/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:17-cv-00622-GMN-NJK Document 48 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Joel E. Tasca, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 14124
Maria A. Gall, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14200
Lindsay C. Demaree, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11949
Kyle A. Ewing, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 14051
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: (702) 471-7000
Facsimile: (702) 471-7070
tasca@ballardspahr.com
gallm@ballardspahr.com
demareel@ballardspahr.com
ewingk@ballardspahr.com
Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
13
14
15
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
19
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company;
ELDORADO THIRD COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation; PERRY PIERCE, an
individual,
20
Defendants.
17
18
21
22
ELDORADO THIRD COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, a Nevada non-profit
corporation,
23
Third-Party Plaintiff,
24
vs.
25
ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES,
LLC, a domestic limited liability company,
26
Case No. 2:17-cv-00622-GMN-NJK
Third-Party Defendant.
27
28
DMWEST #17437071 v1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE MOTION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(First Request)
Case 2:17-cv-00622-GMN-NJK Document 48 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 4
1
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company,
2
Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant,
3
vs.
4
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;
PERRY PIERCE, an individual,
5
Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendant.
6
7
8
9
10
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Pursuant
26
27
28
LR
IA
6-1,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Cross-Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) and Defendant/Counter-Claimant/CrossClaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and
through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to amend the
briefing schedules on the Parties’ respective Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF
Nos. 40/42 and 44)1 as follows:
1.
Chase filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 40 and 42) on
January 8, 2018.
2.
SFR filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44) on January
8, 2018.
3.
Chase filed its Response to SFR’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 46) on January 29, 2018.
4.
SFR filed its Response Chase’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 47) on January 29, 2018.
5.
The Parties hereby stipulate that they will have up to and until
February 28, 2018 (current due date is February 12, 2018) to file their Replies in
support of their respective Motions for Summary Judgment.
6.
24
25
to
This is the Parties’ first request to extend time for these Motions.
Chase originally filed its Motion for Summary Judgment at ECF No. 40 but later
refiled the Motion at ECF No. 42 after learning that it had incorrectly filed exhibits
to ECF No. 40. Chase has requested that the Court remove the Motion at ECF No.
40 from its docket. See Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document, ECF No. 41.
SFR does not oppose Chase’s request. See Notice of Non-Opposition to Chase’s
Motion to Remove, ECF No. 45.
1
2
DMWEST #17437071 v1
Case 2:17-cv-00622-GMN-NJK Document 48 Filed 02/05/18 Page 3 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
7.
The Parties agreed to this extension to accommodate the schedules of
counsel and to offset necessary delays in briefing related to the Motions.
The Parties make this request for a brief extension of time in good faith and
not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
8
9
10
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
13
14
15
16
Dated: February 5, 2018
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
KIM GILBERT EBRON
By: /s/ Maria A. Gall
Joel E. Tasca, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 14124
Maria A. Gall, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14200
Lindsay C. Demaree, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11949
Kyle A. Ewing, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 14051
1980 Festival Plaza Dr., Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
By: /s/ Diana S. Ebron
Diana S. Ebron, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Nevada Bar no. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Dr., Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Attorneys for Plaintiff/CounterDefendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Attorneys for Defendant/CounterClaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR
Investments Pool 1, LLC
17
18
19
ORDER
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21
22
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
23
DATED:
24
25
26
27
28
3
DMWEST #17437071 v1
February 14, 2018
Case 2:17-cv-00622-GMN-NJK Document 48 Filed 02/05/18 Page 4 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
13
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on February 5, 2018, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 5, a true copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
THE DISPOSITIVE BRIEFING SCHEDULE (First Request) was filed via the
Court’s CM/ECF System and electronically served by the Court on all parties who
have appeared.
I further certify that on February 5, 2018, and pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 5, I directed the mailing of true copies of the foregoing
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DISPOSITIVE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE (First Request) to the following parties via U.S. Mail, postage-prepaid,
as follows:
Perry Pierce
2701 N. Rainbow Blvd., Apt. 2110
Las Vegas, NV 89108
14
/s/ Mary Kay Carlton
An Employee of Ballard Spahr LLP
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
DMWEST #17437071 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?