Jackson v. Aranas et al
Filing
35
ORDER that Plaintiff's 5 complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Romeo Aranas, Alberto Buencamino, and Lorrie Stewart, and against Plaintiff Lionell Jackson, and to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 LIONELL JACKSON,
4
Plaintiff
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00634-APG-VCF
Order Dismissing Case
5 v.
6 ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
7
8
Defendants
Two of this court’s orders were returned in the mail. ECF Nos. 30, 32. Plaintiff Lionell
9 Jackson therefore has failed to maintain his address as required under the Local Rules. Under
10 Local Rule IA 3-1, a pro se party must immediately advise the court of any change of address.
11 “Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default
12 judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.” LR IA 3-1.
13
I previously ordered plaintiff Lionell Jackson to show cause in writing why this action
14 should not be dismissed for failure to advise the court of a change of address. ECF No. 33. I
15 warned Jackson that failure to respond to the order would result in dismissal of this action with
16 prejudice. Id. The order to show cause was also returned in the mail and Jackson has not updated
17 his address or otherwise responded to the order. ECF No. 34.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Lionell Jackson’s complaint (ECF No. 5) is
19 DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of
20 defendants Romeo Aranas, Alberto Buencamino, and Lorrie Stewart, and against plaintiff
21 Lionell Jackson, and to close this case.
22
DATED this 30th day of May, 2019.
23
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?