Hartman v. LM General Insurance Company et al

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 6 Stipulation to File First Amended Complaint (First Request). LM's 4 Motion to Dismiss is withdrawn without prejudice. First Amended Complaint deadline: 4/24/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00649-JCM-GWF Document 6 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ANDREW C. GREEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9399 RIKKI J. HEVRIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13738 KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP 400 S. 4th Street, Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: (702) 853-5500 Fax: (702) 853-5599 Andrew.green@knchlaw.com Rikki.hevrin@knchlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants, LM General Insurance Company also erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual, Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 JOHN HARTMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ) LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC. DBA ) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY AND DBA LIBERTY MUTUAL; ) LIBERTY MUTUAL AUTO AND HOME ) SERVICES, LLC; LIBERTY MUTUAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY AKA LIBERTY ) MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.; DOES I ) through X, inclusive, and ROE ) CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive; ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00649-JCM-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) 24 COMES NOW, Defendants, LM General Insurance Company (hereinafter “LM”) also 25 erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. dba Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and 26 dba Liberty Mutual; Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC; Liberty Mutual Insurance 27 Company aka Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., by and through its attorneys, KOELLER, 28 NEBEKER, CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP, and Plaintiff, John Hartman (hereinafter Page 1 of 5 455709.2 Case 2:17-cv-00649-JCM-GWF Document 6 Filed 03/22/17 Page 2 of 5 1 “Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys, SEEGMILLER & ASSOCIATES, and hereby agree 2 and stipulate as follows: 3 1. The parties having conferred regarding the substance of LM’s Motion to 4 Dismiss (ECF #4), and agreeing Plaintiff may seek amendment of his Complaint to 5 attempt to address the majority of the issues raised therein, the parties present this 6 Stipulation and Order to attempt resolution of the issues raised in LM’s Motion to 7 Dismiss without Court intervention at this time; 8 2. 9 to attempt to address the matters raised by LM’s Motion to Dismiss; LM stipulates Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint by April 24, 2017 10 3. Consistent with the parties’ stipulation for Plaintiff to file an Amended 11 Complaint, LM’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF #4) is withdrawn without prejudice, and all 12 of the Defendants’ potential defenses and rights to answer and/or respond to Plaintiff’s 13 initial Complaint and any Amended Complaint are preserved through the time stated in 14 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to respond to any Amended Complaint. 15 4. 16 Defendants named in Plaintiff’s initial Complaint prior to any deadline for response or 17 answer to any Amended Complaint, and that this stipulation will be effective to set 18 aside any default against the Defendants entered prior to the deadline for response or 19 answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint; 20 5. 21 time for responsive pleading or answer for any First Amended Complaint by Plaintiff 22 will be determined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure following Plaintiff filing 23 any First Amended Complaint; 24 6. 25 each of the following previously named Defendants, Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. dba 26 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and dba Liberty Mutual, Liberty Mutual Auto and 27 Home Services, LLC, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company aka Liberty Mutual The parties stipulate no default will be requested or entered for any of the No further responsive pleading is presently due from LM or Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff agrees he will file a separate stipulation to dismiss without prejudice 28 Page 2 of 5 455709.2 Case 2:17-cv-00649-JCM-GWF Document 6 Filed 03/22/17 Page 3 of 5 1 Insurance Co., and Plaintiff agrees any First Amended Complaint will not reference 2 any of the entities identified in this paragraph as Defendants. 3 7. 4 leave LM General Insurance Company as the sole Defendant, which the parties agree 5 would be a proper party to a dispute regarding the policy issued to Plaintiff with policy 6 number AOS-268-021313-40 4 8. 7 8. 8 Amended Complaint by way of the electronic filing and serving system. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 The effect of the dismissal referenced in the preceding paragraph will be to Undersigned counsel for LM agrees to accept service of Plaintiff’s First DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017. DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017. KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP SEEGMILLER & ASSOCIATES By: By: /s/Andrew C. Green, Esq. ANDREW C. GREEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9399 RIKKI J. HEVRIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13738 400 S. Fourth Street, Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendants, LM General Insurance Company also erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual, Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. /s/Clark Seegmiller, Esq. CLARK SEEGMILLER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3873 10655 Park Run Drive, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOHN HARTMAN 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 5 455709.2 Case 2:17-cv-00649-JCM-GWF Document 6 Filed 03/22/17 Page 4 of 5 ORDER 1 IT IS SO ORDERED, consistent with the parties’ stipulation above, Plaintiff may file 2 a First Amended Complaint by April 24, 2017, and LM’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF #4) is 3 withdrawn without prejudice. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, all of the Defendants’ potential defenses and rights to 5 answer and/or respond to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint and any Amended Complaint are 6 preserved through the time stated in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to respond to any 7 Amended Complaint; therefore, no default will be requested or entered for any of the 8 Defendants named in Plaintiff’s initial Complaint prior to any deadline for response or answer 9 to any Amended Complaint, and the Parties’ stipulation will be effective to set aside any 10 default against the Defendants entered prior to the deadline for response or answer to Plaintiff’s 11 Amended Complaint; 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, upon Plaintiff filing any First Amended Complaint by 13 April 24, 2017, that any response to the First Amended Complaint may proceed pursuant to the 14 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 15 23rd Dated this _____ day of March, 2017. 16 17 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES C. MAHAN 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// Page 4 of 5 455709.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?