Crawford v. Nevada Department of Transportation et al

Filing 33

ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 30 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request). Responses due by 5/11/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
TREVOR J. HATFIELD, ESQ 1 Nevada Bar No. 7373 2 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 703 S. Eighth Street 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 388-4469 4 Facsimile: (702) 386-9825 5 Email: thatfield@hatfieldlawassociates.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 CASE NO: 2:17-cv-00655-GMN-PAL 9 KENDRICK CRAWFORD, 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 15 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, A Department of the State of Nevada; WILSON MARSHALL, an individual employed by the State of Nevada; AND SONNIE BRAIH, an individual employed by the State of Nevada, STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) 16 Defendants. 17 18 COMES NOW, Plaintiff KENDRICK CRAWFORD (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and 19 through his counsel, Trevor J. Hatfield, of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd., and Defendants 20 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, WILSON MARSHALL, and SONNIE 21 BRAIH (hereinafter “Defendants”), by and through their counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney 22 General, Cameron P. Vandenberg, Chief Deputy Attorney General, and Dominika Batten, 23 Deputy Attorney General, and do hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiff 24 25 to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #30) that was filed on April 6, 26 2018. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including May 11, 2018 to respond to 27 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #30). 28 April 27, 2018. The Opposition is currently due on 1 This request is submitted pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2 and LR II 7-1 and is the parties’ first 2 request for an extension concerning an extension of the time for Plaintiff to respond to 3 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The reason for the request is due to Plaintiff’s 4 attorney having been on a two-week vacation and travel for a settlement conference, this motion 5 having been filed while he was on vacation, and just only recently having an opportunity to meet 6 with Plaintiff to prepare a response to Defendants’ motion. 7 8 Dated: April 26, 2018 Dated: April 26, 2018 9 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 10 /s/ Trevor J. Hatfield 11 ___________________________________ Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq. 12 Nevada Bar No. 7373 13 703 S. Eighth St. Las Vegas, NV 89101 14 (702) 388-4469 Tel. (702) 386-9825 Fax 15 thatfield@hatfieldlawassociates.com 16 Attorney for Plaintiff 17 ORDER 18 19 20 /s/ Cameron P. Vandenberg __________________________________ Cameron P. Vandenberg Nevada Bar No. 4356 Chief Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 5420 Kietzke Lane, Suite 202 Reno, NV 89511 cvandenberg@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED this _____day of April, 2018. ____________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 26th day of April, 2018, I filed and served the parties’ 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REQUESTING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO 4 RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) 5 with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which served the parties hereto electronically. 6 DATED: 26th day of April, 2018 7 By: Freda P. Brazier An employee of Hatfield & Associates, Ltd. 8 9 703 8th Street * Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (702) 388-4469 HATFIELD & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?