Pope v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al

Filing 6

ORDER that this habeas action is Dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction and a certificate of appealability is Denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 11 12 KEVIN DONALD POPE, v. Petitioner, ORDER FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Respondents. 13 14 Case No. 2:17-cv-00664-APG-GWF On April 19, 2017, this court dismissed habeas petitioner Kevin Donald Pope’s 15 petition with leave to amend to add the proper respondent within fifteen (15) days of the 16 date of the order (ECF No. 4). The proper respondent in this action is Pope’s custodian, 17 who in this case appears to be the warden or director of Community Corrections Center 18 in Las Vegas, Nevada. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989) 19 (holding that § 2241 petitioner’s “true custodian” was the warden of the federal facility 20 where he was incarcerated). Pope was expressly advised that failure to file an 21 amended petition in conformance with that order would result in the dismissal of this 22 action for lack of personal jurisdiction. 23 More than the allotted time has passed, and Pope has failed to file an amended 24 petition or respond to this court’s order in any way. Accordingly, the petition shall be 25 dismissed. 26 27 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this habeas action is DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction. 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find the court’s dismissal of this action to be debatable or incorrect. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DATED: 30 May 2017. 8 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?