Harris v. Vegas Valley Collection, LLC
Filing
5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file his certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4/14/2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
LEON HARRIS, JR.,
8
9
10
11
v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-00685-APG-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
VEGAS VALLEY COLLECTION, LLC,
Defendant.
12
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s failure to file a Certificate as to Interested
13
Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed March 7,
14
2017. No answer has been filed. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases
15
(except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the
16
disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms,
17
partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest
18
in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties
19
other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally,
20
LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the
21
information that this rule requires. To date, plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
22
IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file his certificate of interested parties, which fully
23
complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than April 14, 2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance
24
of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
25
DATED this 31st day of March, 2017.
26
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?