Bank v. Winner
Filing
4
ORDER that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1 ) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
STEVEN J. BANK,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ELLWORTH WINNER,
)
)
Respondent.
)
____________________________________/
Case no. 2:17-cv-00691-RFB-NJK
ORDER
13
14
This case is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. With his petition,
15
Bank seeks to challenge the issuance of a traffic citation and the municipal court’s denial of his
16
motion to dismiss.
17
The court has reviewed Bank’s petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The federal courts
18
have jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus to someone who “is in custody in violation of the
19
Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). The “in custody”
20
requirement is jurisdictional. Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490 (1989) (per curiam).
21
Bank does not allege facts establishing that can meet the “in custody” requirement. In
22
general, courts hold that the imposition of a fine does not suffice. Bailey v. Hill, 599 F.3d 976, 979
23
(9th Cir. 2010); Williamson v. Gregoire, 151 F.3d 1180, 1183 (9th Cir. 1998); Dremann v. Francis,
24
828 F.2d 6, 7 (9th Cir. 1987). Bank does not otherwise state or suggest how his liberty being
25
restrained in a manner for him to be considered “in custody.” Thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to
26
grant habeas relief.
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability.
4
DATED this 22nd day of March, 2017.
5
6
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?