Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. REO Investments Advisors V, LLC et al
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 21 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 7/19/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12807
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
(702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345
yli@wrightlegal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as
Indenture Trustee of the Aames Mortgage
Investment Trust 2004-1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF
THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT
TRUST 2004-1,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
REO INVESTMENT ADVISORS V LLC;
HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; and NEVADA
ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.,
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO HERITAGE ESTATES
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
[First Request]
16
17
18
Defendants.
Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE
19
TRUSTEE OF THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-1, (hereinafter
20
“Deutsche Bank” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, Dana Jonathon Nitz,
21
Esq. and Yanxiong Li, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP and Defendant,
22
HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (hereinafter “HOA” and collectively
23
with “Deutsche Bank” as the “Parties”), by and through its attorneys of record, Wing Y. Wong,
24
Esq. and Brian K. Walters, Esq., of the law firm of Gordon Rees, LLP hereby stipulate and agree
25
to extend the deadline for Deutsche Bank to file its Opposition to HOA’s Motion to Dismiss
26
(“Motion”) up to and including July 19, 2017.
27
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 07/12/17 Page 2 of 3
1
Plaintiff filed its Complaint on March 8, 2017 [ECF No. 1], to which HOA responded by
2
filing a Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2017 [ECF No. 21]. The current deadline for Plaintiff to
3
file its Opposition to HOA’s Motion is July 14, 2017.
4
Since the HOA filed its Motion, the Parties were engaged in substantive discussions
5
regarding the prospect of staying or dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff’s claims against the
6
HOA in this matter. Such a resolution would have avoided the need for further briefing by the
7
Parties. Regrettably, these discussions have recently reached an impasse. Plaintiff intends to file
8
a response to HOA’s Motion as a result, and Parties are agreeable to allow Plaintiff a short
9
extension of time to adequately address the substantial arguments made in HOA’s Motion.
10
Therefore, good cause exists for this short extension. This is the first request for an
11
extension of time and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.
12
Dated this 12th day of July, 2017.
13
Dated this 12th day of July, 2017.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
GORDON & REES LLP
/s/ Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Yanxiong Li, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12807
7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee
of the Aames Mortgage Investment Trust 20041
/s/ Brian K. Walters, Esq.__________
Brian K. Walters, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9711
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1550
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Defendant, Heritage Estates
Homeowners Association
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ORDER
22
23
24
25
Based on the foregoing Stipulation by and between the parties, and good cause
appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7/12/2017
Dated:_______________________
26
27
_________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
28
Page 2 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?