Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. REO Investments Advisors V, LLC et al

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 24 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 21 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 7/19/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0050 Yanxiong Li, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12807 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345 yli@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee of the Aames Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-1, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. REO INVESTMENT ADVISORS V LLC; HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; and NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., Case No.: 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS [First Request] 16 17 18 Defendants. Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE 19 TRUSTEE OF THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-1, (hereinafter 20 “Deutsche Bank” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its attorneys of record, Dana Jonathon Nitz, 21 Esq. and Yanxiong Li, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP and Defendant, 22 HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (hereinafter “HOA” and collectively 23 with “Deutsche Bank” as the “Parties”), by and through its attorneys of record, Wing Y. Wong, 24 Esq. and Brian K. Walters, Esq., of the law firm of Gordon Rees, LLP hereby stipulate and agree 25 to extend the deadline for Deutsche Bank to file its Opposition to HOA’s Motion to Dismiss 26 (“Motion”) up to and including July 19, 2017. 27 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL Document 24 Filed 07/12/17 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff filed its Complaint on March 8, 2017 [ECF No. 1], to which HOA responded by 2 filing a Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2017 [ECF No. 21]. The current deadline for Plaintiff to 3 file its Opposition to HOA’s Motion is July 14, 2017. 4 Since the HOA filed its Motion, the Parties were engaged in substantive discussions 5 regarding the prospect of staying or dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff’s claims against the 6 HOA in this matter. Such a resolution would have avoided the need for further briefing by the 7 Parties. Regrettably, these discussions have recently reached an impasse. Plaintiff intends to file 8 a response to HOA’s Motion as a result, and Parties are agreeable to allow Plaintiff a short 9 extension of time to adequately address the substantial arguments made in HOA’s Motion. 10 Therefore, good cause exists for this short extension. This is the first request for an 11 extension of time and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party. 12 Dated this 12th day of July, 2017. 13 Dated this 12th day of July, 2017. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP GORDON & REES LLP /s/ Yanxiong Li, Esq. Yanxiong Li, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12807 7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee of the Aames Mortgage Investment Trust 20041 /s/ Brian K. Walters, Esq.__________ Brian K. Walters, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9711 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1550 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendant, Heritage Estates Homeowners Association 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER 22 23 24 25 Based on the foregoing Stipulation by and between the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7/12/2017 Dated:_______________________ 26 27 _________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 Page 2 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?