Laforge et al v. Richland Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER Granting 44 Emergency MOTION for Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 Marquis Aurbach Coffing Terry A. Coffing, Esq. 2 Nevada Bar No. 4949 Chad F. Clement, Esq. 3 Nevada Bar No. 12192 Jared M. Moser, Esq. 4 Nevada Bar No. 13003 10001 Park Run Drive 5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 6 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 tcoffing@maclaw.com 7 cclement@maclaw.com jmoser@maclaw.com 8 Attorneys for Richland Holdings, Inc. d/b/a AcctCorp of Southern Nevada, 9 RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services, and Randall Corporation 10 d/b/a Bowen Law Offices 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 STEPHEN LAFORGE and BUNNY LAFORGE, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 vs. 16 RICHLAND HOLDINGS, INC. d/b/a 17 ACCTCORP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, a Nevada Corporation; R.C. WILLEY aka RC 18 WILLEY FINANCIAL SERVICES, RANDALL CORPORATION d/b/a BOWEN 19 LAW OFFICES; CALEB J. LANGSDALE, ESQ. dba The LANGSDALE LAW FIRM, 20 P.C., 21 22 Case Number: 2:17-cv-782-APG-VCF [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER TO PRODUCE CREDIT REPORTS Defendants. Defendants Richland Holdings, Inc. d/b/a AcctCorp of Southern Nevada’s 23 (“AcctCorp”), RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services’ (“RC Willey”), and Randall 24 Corporation d/b/a Bowen Law Offices’ (“Bowen Law”) Emergency Motion for Order to 25 Produce Credit Reports [ECF No. 44] (the “Motion”) came before this Court on 26 November 1, 2017 at 1:30 p.m., with Chad F. Clement, Esq. and Jared M. Moser, Esq., of 27 the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, appearing on behalf of AcctCorp, RC Willey and Page 1 of 4 MAC:14665-006 3240738_1 11/6/2017 7:29 PM 1 Bowen Law; and Vernon Nelson, Esq. and Margaret Foley, Esq., of the Law Offices of 2 Vernon Nelson, appearing for Plaintiffs Stephen LaForge and Bunny LaForge (“Plaintiffs”); 3 and Arthur N. Bortz, Esq., of the law firm of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, appearing 4 on behalf of Defendant Caleb J. Langsdale, Esq. dba The Langsdale Law Firm, P.C. 5 (“Langsdale”). 6 The Court having canvassed and heard representations and arguments of the parties, 7 no response having been filed to the Motion [ECF No. 44], 8 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 9 1. AcctCorp’s, RC Willey’s, and Bowen Law’s Emergency Motion for 10 Production of Documents is hereby GRANTED; 11 2. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) is ORDERED to produce 12 to counsel for AcctCorp, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of service of this 13 Order, all documents within its possession, custody, and control responsive to AcctCorp’s 14 Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of 15 Premises in a Civil Action (the “Subpoena”); 16 3. Accordingly, Experian is ORDERED to produce a comprehensive and 17 detailed credit report for Stephen LaForge and for Bunny LaForge, respectively, the scope of 18 which shall cover the time period from January 1, 2012, to present; 19 4. Moreover, Experian is FURTHER ORDERED to produce a comprehensive 20 and detailed credit report (or other summary, graph, chart, compilation, etc., of the credit 21 reports) for Stephen LaForge and Bunny LaForge, respectively, that identifies Plaintiffs’ 22 respective credit scores as each may have changed from time to time, with sufficient detail 23 to be able to identify (a) the changed credit scores, (b) when the changes occurred, and (c) 24 why the changes occurred, the scope of which shall cover the time period from January 1, 25 2012, to present. 26 / / / 27 / / / Page 2 of 4 MAC:14665-006 3240738_1 11/6/2017 7:29 PM 1 5. The parties, and each of them, shall cooperate, to the extent necessary, in 2 order to provide counsel for AcctCorp with additional information that Experian may 3 reasonably request in order to produce the requested documents. 4 ORDER 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9th day of November, 2017. 8 CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 Respectfully submitted by: 13 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 14 By: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ Jared M. Moser Terry A. Coffing, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4949 Chad F. Clement, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12192 Jared M. Moser, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13003 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Richland Holdings, Inc. d/b/a AcctCorp of Southern Nevada, RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services, and Randall Corporation d/b/a Bowen Law Offices 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 3 of 4 MAC:14665-006 3240738_1 11/6/2017 7:29 PM 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: 3 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER TO PRODUCE CREDIT REPORTS with the 4 Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court by using the court’s CM/ECF system 5 on the 6th day of November, 2017. 6 I further certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users 7 and that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system. 8 I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered 9 CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing document by First-Class Mail, postage prepaid, 10 or have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within 3 calendar days 11 to the following non-CM/ECF participants: 12 The Law Office of Vernon Nelson Vernon A. Nelson, Jr. Esq. 13 9480 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 252 Las Vegas, NV 89123 14 Tel: 702-476-2500 Fax: 702-476-2788 15 vnelson@nelsonlawfirmlv.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley Stephen J. Erigero, Esq. Timothy J. Lepore, Esq. 3753 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant Langsdale Law Firm, P.C. 17 18 19 20 21 /s/ Jared M. Moser Counsel for Richland Holdings, Inc. d/b/a AcctCorp of Southern Nevada, RC Willey aka RC Willey Financial Services, and Randall Corporation d/b/a Bowen Law Offices 22 23 24 25 26 27 Page 4 of 4 MAC:14665-006 3240738_1 11/6/2017 7:29 PM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?