Berberich v. Kishner

Filing 19

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 15 Defendant's Motion to Strike Personal-Data Identifiers is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court will not strike the documents containing thehome address. The Clerk of Court is directed to seal [ 4], 5 and 13 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file in accordance with LR IC 6-1(a)(5) redacted versions of ECF Nos. 4 , 5 , and 13 , on or before 5/25/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 KENNETH BERBERICH, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 8 vs. HONORABLE JOANNA S. KISHNER, 9 2:17-cv-00818-JCM-VCF ORDER Defendant. 10 11 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Strike Personal-Data Identifiers (ECF No. 15). 12 Under LR IC 6-1 (a)(5), parties must refrain from including—or must partially redact, where 13 inclusion is necessary—the following personal-data identifiers from all documents filed with the court, 14 including exhibits, whether filed electronically or in paper, unless the court orders otherwise and if a home 15 address must be included, only the city and state should be listed. Here, Plaintiff has listed Judge Joanna 16 S. Kishner’s full home address in several documents. 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Strike Personal-Data Identifiers (ECF No. 19 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court will not strike the documents containing the 20 home address. The Clerk of Court is directed to seal ECF No. 4, ECF No. 5 and ECF No. 13. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file in accordance with LR IC 6-1(a)(5) redacted versions of ECF Nos. 4, 5, and 13, on or before May 25, 2017. DATED this 17th day of May, 2017. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?