Zimmerman v. Petsmart, Inc.
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation for Extension to Respond to Complaint. Petsmart, Inc. answer due 5/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kelly H. Dove
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.784.5200
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: kdove@swlaw.com
mparetti@swlaw.com
7
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
Jean F. Kuei
Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed
REED SMITH LLP
1301 K. Street, N.W.
Suite 1000 – East Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: 202.414.9200
Facsimile: 202.414.9299
Email: jkuei@reedsmith.com
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
15
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Kevin Zimmerman, and individual,
16
Case No. 2:17-cv-00823-RFB-CWH
Plaintiff,
17
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
vs.
PetSmart, Inc.,
19
Defendant.
(FIRST REQUEST)
20
21
Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, PetSmart, Inc. (“PetSmart”) by
22
and through their undersigned counsel (collectively the “Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby
23
stipulate and agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc #1] to
24
May 25, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request.
25
26
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good
cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:
27
1.
Plaintiff served the Complaint and Summons on PetSmart on April 13, 2017.
28
2.
PetSmart’s Answer is currently due May 4, 2017.
Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 3
1
3.
Counsel for PetSmart was only recently retained, and requires additional time to
2
locate, organize, and review the relevant documents and prepare the appropriate response. In
3
addition, the Parties are discussing potential settlement.
4
4.
The Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.
5
5.
This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the
6
purpose of delay.
7
8
Therefore, the Parties jointly agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint to May 25, 2017.
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
DATED: APRIL 25, 2017
DATED: APRIL 25, 2017
THE WILCHER FIRM
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
By: /s/ Whitney C. Wilcher
Whitney C. Wilcher
8465 West Sahara Avenue
Suite 111-236
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove
Kelly H. Dove
Michael Paretti
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman
Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc.
17
18
ORDER
19
20
21
IT IS ORDERED that PetSmart shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before May
25, 2017.
22
23
24
25
26
April 26
DATED: __________________, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT OR JUDGE
STATES MAGISTRATE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
-2-
Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 3 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3
By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove_____________________
Kelly H. Dove
Michael Paretti
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
Jean F. Kuei
Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed
REED SMITH LLP
1301 K. Street, N.W.
Suite 1000 – East Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc.
4843-4841-8631
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?