Zimmerman v. Petsmart, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation for Extension to Respond to Complaint. Petsmart, Inc. answer due 5/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kelly H. Dove Nevada Bar No. 10569 Michael Paretti Nevada Bar No. 13926 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.784.5200 Facsimile: 702.784.5252 Email: kdove@swlaw.com mparetti@swlaw.com 7 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 Jean F. Kuei Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed REED SMITH LLP 1301 K. Street, N.W. Suite 1000 – East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202.414.9200 Facsimile: 202.414.9299 Email: jkuei@reedsmith.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Kevin Zimmerman, and individual, 16 Case No. 2:17-cv-00823-RFB-CWH Plaintiff, 17 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT vs. PetSmart, Inc., 19 Defendant. (FIRST REQUEST) 20 21 Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, PetSmart, Inc. (“PetSmart”) by 22 and through their undersigned counsel (collectively the “Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby 23 stipulate and agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc #1] to 24 May 25, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request. 25 26 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons: 27 1. Plaintiff served the Complaint and Summons on PetSmart on April 13, 2017. 28 2. PetSmart’s Answer is currently due May 4, 2017. Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 2 of 3 1 3. Counsel for PetSmart was only recently retained, and requires additional time to 2 locate, organize, and review the relevant documents and prepare the appropriate response. In 3 addition, the Parties are discussing potential settlement. 4 4. The Parties agreed to the extension requested herein. 5 5. This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the 6 purpose of delay. 7 8 Therefore, the Parties jointly agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to May 25, 2017. 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 DATED: APRIL 25, 2017 DATED: APRIL 25, 2017 THE WILCHER FIRM SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. By: /s/ Whitney C. Wilcher Whitney C. Wilcher 8465 West Sahara Avenue Suite 111-236 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove Kelly H. Dove Michael Paretti 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc. 17 18 ORDER 19 20 21 IT IS ORDERED that PetSmart shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before May 25, 2017. 22 23 24 25 26 April 26 DATED: __________________, 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT OR JUDGE STATES MAGISTRATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 -2- Case 2:17-cv-00823-GMN-GWF Document 12 Filed 04/25/17 Page 3 of 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3 By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove_____________________ Kelly H. Dove Michael Paretti SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 702.784.5200 11 Jean F. Kuei Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed REED SMITH LLP 1301 K. Street, N.W. Suite 1000 – East Tower Washington, D.C. 20005 Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc. 4843-4841-8631 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?