Brown v. Lever et al

Filing 10

USCA ORDER denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus Re: 9 Petition. Signed by USCA 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Case: 17-72997, 01/23/2018, ID: 10735027, DktEntry: 3, Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED
JAN 23 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: ROGER RAPHAEL BROWN.
______________________________
ROGER RAPHAEL BROWN,
Petitioner,
v.

No.

17-72997

D.C. No.
2:17-cv-00828-JAD-PAL
District of Nevada,
Las Vegas
ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS
VEGAS,
Respondent,
J. LEVER, #5712 and TALLMAN, #13318,
Real Parties in Interest.
Before: REINHARDT, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to the filing
of a new petition if the district court has not screened petitioner’s complaint as
required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(a) within 90 days.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is denied as
moot.

SLL/MOATT