McDowell v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 36 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 3/26/2018. Motions due by 4/25/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/14/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL Document 36 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 3
1 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard,
Wayte & Carruth LLP
2 Wade M. Hansard
Nevada Bar No. 8104
3
wade.hansard@mccormickbarstow.com
Jonathan W. Carlson
4 Nevada Bar No. 10536
jonathan.carlson@mccormickbarstow.com
5 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
6 Telephone:
(702) 949-1100
Facsimile:
(702) 949-1101
7
Attorneys for Defendant
8 Government Employees Insurance Company
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
OLGA McDOWELL, individually,
Case No. 2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DISCOVERY DEADLINE DATES
(SECOND REQUEST)
15
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
16 INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES I - X; and
ROE CORPORATIONS I - X, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties to extend the discovery
21 deadline of December 26, 2017; the initial expert disclosure deadline of October 27, 2017; the rebuttal
22 expert disclosure deadline of November 27, 2017; the dispositive motion deadline of January 25,
23 2018; and the Pre-Trial Order deadline of February 26, 2018. In accordance with Local Rule 26-4, the
24 parties state as follows:
25
(a)
26
The completed discovery is as follows: Both parties have completed initial Rule 26
DISCOVERY COMPLETED BY THE PARTIES
27 Disclosures. Plaintiff has propounded a first set of interrogatories, first set of request for admissions
28 and first set of request for production of documents. Defendant has propounded a first set of
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113
2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINE DATES (SECOND REQUEST)
Case 2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL Document 36 Filed 10/17/17 Page 2 of 3
1 interrogatories, first set of request for admissions and first set of request for production of documents.
2 Plaintiff’s deposition went forward on August 25, 2017. Plaintiff has disclosed all treating physicians
3 as non-retained expert witnesses. Defendant has disclosed Dr. Joseph Schifini and Dr. Hugh Selznick
4 as defense experts.
5
(b)
DISCOVERY WHICH REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED:
6
Plaintiff seeks to schedule a deposition of a Rule 30(b)(6) witness on behalf of the Defendant.
7 Further, both parties may need to retain claims handling experts and Plaintiff seeks to depose two or
8 three additional claims handlers with the Defendant, all of whom are located out of state. Herein lies
9 the impetus behind the parties request for additional time. Defendant filed several dispositive
10 motions, as follows: Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative to Sever/Bifurcate and Stay Extra11 contractual claims (Doc. 7), Motion to Stay Claims for Bad Faith (Doc. 8), and Motion to Strike the
12 Allegations of the Complaint Regarding the Medical Examination of Dr. Schifini (Doc. 9). The Court
13 recently ruled upon those motions (Doc. 35), the outcome being that substantial extra-contractual
14 discovery is now going to occur. Further, Defendant will supplement prior discovery responses in
15 light of the ruling as well. Therefore, the parties request an additional ninety (90) days extension so
16 that they can obtain a ruling from the Court on these Motions, which will provide guidance on what, if
17 any, extra-contractual discovery will be necessary.
18
(c)
REASONS WHY DISCOVERY WAS NOT SATISFIED OR COMPLETED WITHIN
19 THE TIME LIMIT SET BY THE DISCOVERY PLAN:
20
The Court only recently heard and decided upon GEICO’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the
21 Alternative, to Sever/Bifurcate and to Stay Claims for Bad Faith. (Doc. 35). In light of the Court’s
22 ruling, Plaintiff seeks to depose several GEICO pre-litigation claims handlers and potentially
23 GEICO’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness(es) as well. In addition, both parties may require retention of claims
24 handling or other experts to opine on the extra-contractual claims. The parties therefore request a
25 brief ninety (90) day continuance of the deadlines in this matter in order to conduct the remaining
26 depositions and expert discovery.
27
(d)
THE CURRENT SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF ALL REMAINING
28 DISCOVERY:
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113
2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINE DATES (SECOND REQUEST)
Case 2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL Document 36 Filed 10/17/17 Page 3 of 3
1
The parties request that all pertinent discovery deadlines set forth in the court’s Scheduling
2 Order be continued ninety (90) days, as follows: Close of discovery on March 26, 2018; initial expert
3 disclosure deadline on December 26, 2017; rebuttal expert disclosure deadline on January 25, 2018;
4 the dispositive motion deadline of April 25, 2018; and the Pre-Trial Order deadline of May 29, 2018.
DATED this 17th day of October, 2017
5
6
GLEN LERNER INJURY ATTORNEYS
7
By
8
9
10
/s/ Joshua L. Benson
Joshua L. Benson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10514
4795 South Durango Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89147
Tel. (702) 877-1500
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Olga McDowell
11
12
13
DATED this 17th day of October, 2017
14
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
15
By
16
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant
Government Employees Insurance Company
21
22
/s/ Jonathan W. Carlson
Wade M. Hansard
Nevada Bar No. 8104
Jonathan W. Carlson
Nevada Bar No. 10536
8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113
Tel. (702) 949-1100
4756236.1
23
24
25
26
27
28
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW,
SHEPPARD, W AYTE &
CARRUTH LLP
8337 W. SUNSET RD, SUITE 350
LAS VEGAS, NV 89113
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day
of November, 2017.
___________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
2:17-cv-00864-APG-PAL
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY DEADLINE DATES (SECOND REQUEST)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?