Panacea Scientific, Inc. v. ATM Metabolics, LLC. et al

Filing 37

ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action per ECF No. 36 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ALEXANDER D. BROWN, Fla Bar No.: 752665, Pro Hac Vice ADAM S. GOLDMAN, Fla. Bar No.: 86761, Pro Hac Vice The Concept Law Group, P.A. 6400 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Telephone: (754) 300-1325 ABrown@ConceptLaw.com AGoldman@ConceptLaw.com W. WEST ALLEN, Nevada Bar No.: 5566 Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 257-1483 WAllen@HowardandHoward.com Counsel for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff ATM Metabolics, LLC and Defendant M. Joseph Ahrens UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 PANACEA SCIENTIFIC, INC., a Nevada Corporation 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. ATM METABOLICS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, and M. JOSEPH AHRENS, an individual 19 20 21 22 25 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. -----------------------------ATM METABOLICS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 23 24 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00869-MMD-VCF Counter-Plaintiff, vs. PANACEA SCIENTIFIC, INC., a Nevada Corporation, 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 Counter-Defendant, -----------------------------ATM METABOLICS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Third-Party Plaintiff, 5 vs. 6 7 8 CHAD A. LACHAPELLE, an individual, Third-Party Defendant. 9 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, ATM METABOLICS, LLC (“ATM”), and Plaintiff/Counter10 11 Defendant, PANACEA SCIENTIFIC, INC. (“Panacea”) (collectively the “Parties”), pursuant to 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby voluntarily dismiss this action, with 13 prejudice, with each Party to bear its own fees and costs. 14 15 Dated this 25th day of July, 2017. Respectfully submitted, 16 17 LAW OFFICE OF BRENT ELLISON THE CONCEPT LAW GROUP, P.A. 18 By: /s/ Brent T. Ellison BRENT T. ELLISON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12200 600 South Third Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 852-1800 Email: brent@mynevadalawoffice.com Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Panacea Scientific, Inc., and Third-Party Defendant, Chad A. LaChappelle By: /s/ Alexander D. Brown ALEXANDER D. BROWN, ESQ. Fla. Bar No. 752665 (pro hac vice) ADAM S. GOLDMAN, ESQ. Fla. Bar No. 86761 (pro hac vice) 6400 North Andrews Ave., Suite 500 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Telephone: (754) 300-1500 Email: abrown@conceptlaw.com Email: agoldman@conceptlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff and Third-Party ATM Metabolics, LLC., and Defendant, Dr. M. Joseph Ahrens 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLANGAS LAW FIRM LTD LEO P. FLANGAS, ESQ Nevada Bar No.: 5637 600 South Third Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone.: (702) 384-1990 Facsimile: (702)-384-1009 Email: leo@flangaslawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Panacea Scientific, Inc., and Third-Party Defendant, Chad A. LaChappelle 8 9 10 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC W. WEST ALLEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5566 WADE GOCHNOUR. ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6314 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 457-1483 Email: wwa@h2law.com Email: wgochnour@howardandhoward.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff and Third-Party ATM Metabolics, LLC., and Defendant, Dr. M. Joseph Ahrens CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 25, 2017, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 11 electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice 12 13 of electronic filing to counsel of record receiving electronic notification. /s/ Alexander D. Brown 14 15 16 17 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE is granted. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 July 25, 2017 Dated: _________________ ______________________ U.S. District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?