Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Five Star Restaurants, LLC et al

Filing 56

ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond re: 52 Motion to Compel. Responses due by 1/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00871-APG-PAL Document 55 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ADAM K. BULT, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 9332 abult@bhfs.com EMILY A. ELLIS, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 11956 eellis@bhfs.com MACKENZIE WARREN, ESQ., Nevada Bar No. 14642 mwarren@bhfs.com BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 Telephone: 702.382.2101 Facsimile: 702.382.8135 Attorneys for Defendants Five Star Restaurants, LLC; Westbury Manor Enterprises, Inc.; Vincent Scotto; and Michelina Scotto 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 702.382.2101 B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation; Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 17 18 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00871-APG-PAL FIVE STAR RESTAURANTS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; WESTBURY MANOR ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware foreign business corporation; VINCENT SCOTTO, an individual; MICHELINA SCOTTO, an individual; DOE INDIVIDUALS 1 through 10, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 11 through 20, inclusive; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS [ECF NO. 52] (First Request) 19 Defendants. 20 21 Defendants Five Star Restaurants, LLC, Westbury Manor Enterprises, Inc., Vincent 22 Scotto, and Michelina Scotto ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record the law firm 23 of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP; and Plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance 24 Company ("Plaintiff", together with Defendants, the "Parties"), by and through its counsel of 25 record The Faux Law Group, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 26 1. 27 On December 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed its Motion to Compel and for Sanctions (ECF No. 52). 28 16254081 1 Case 2:17-cv-00871-APG-PAL Document 55 Filed 12/22/17 Page 2 of 2 1 2. Defendants’ Opposition is currently due on December 27, 2017. However, 2 Defendants require a two-week extension of time to file an opposition in light of scheduling 3 constraints due to the holidays and deadlines in other matters. Plaintiff has agreed to provide 4 Defendants this two-week extension. Therefore, subject to this Court's approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND 6 AGREED by and among the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Defendants' deadline 7 to file their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions is extended to January 8 8, 2018, and the Parties hereby request that the Court enter an order providing the same. 9 DATED this 22nd day of December, 2017. DATED this 22nd day of December, 2017. BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP THE FAUX LAW GROUP 10 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 702.382.2101 B ROWNSTEIN H YATT F ARBER S CHRECK , LLP 5 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 By: /s/ Emily A. Ellis ADAM K. BULT, ESQ., #9332 abult@bhfs.com EMILY A. ELLIS, ESQ., #11956 eellis@bhfs.com MACKENZIE WARREN, ESQ., #14642 mwarren@bhfs.com 100 North City Parkway, Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89106-4614 By: /s/ Jordan F. Faux KURT C. FAUX, ESQ., #3407 kfaux@fauxlaw.com JORDAN F. FAUX, ESQ., #12205 jfaux@fauxlaw.com 1540 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 100 Henderson, NV 89014 Attorneys for Plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company Attorneys for Defendants Five Star Restaurants, LLC; Westbury Manor Enterprises, Inc.; Vincent Scotto; and Michelina Scotto 19 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the foregoing 20 21 Stipulation is APPROVED. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: 23 DATED this 4th day of January, 2018. 24 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 16254081 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?