Rosa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER. Accordingly, the parties 11 stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, is hereby Denied. The parties shall submit a stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than April 19, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 04/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 RITA ROSA, 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 14 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling 15 order. Docket No. 11. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(1),“[u]nless the court orders otherwise, discovery 16 periods longer than 180 days from the date the first defendant answers or otherwise appears will 17 require special scheduling review.” Additionally, “[p]lans requesting special scheduling review must 18 include . . . a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case.” 19 The parties, however, calculate the discovery cut-off based on a date after the first defendant’s first 20 appearance in this action, without explaining why longer or different time periods should apply to 21 this case. Docket No. 11 at 2. Additionally, the parties misstate Local Rule 26-4. See id. 9 Plaintiff(s), 10 vs. 11 WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., 12 Defendant(s). Case No. 2:17-cv-00874-JAD-NJK ORDER 22 Accordingly, the parties’ stipulated proposed discovery plan and scheduling order, Docket 23 No. 11, is hereby DENIED. The parties shall submit a stipulated proposed discovery plan and 24 scheduling order that complies with the Local Rules, no later than April 19, 2017. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: April 12, 2017. 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE ANCY KOPPE PP PP United States Magistrate Judge nited States Magistrate te e gi ra

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?