Kennedy et al v. Las Vegas Sands Corp. et al

Filing 249

ORDER Denying 228 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

10
11
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

9

12
13
14
15
16

Molly M. Rezac
Nevada Bar No. 7435
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]
Mary C. Dollarhide (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DLA Piper LLP (US)
4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100
San Diego, CA 92121
Telephone: [phone]
Khesraw Karmand (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DLA Piper LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: [phone]
Brian Scott Kaplan (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DLA Piper LLP (US)
1251 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor
New York, NY 10020
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Sands Aviation, LLC and
Las Vegas Sands Corp.

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

18
19
20
21

SEAN KENNEDY, individual; ANDREW
SNIDER, individual; CHRISTOPHER
WARD, individual; RANDALL WESTON,
individual; RONALD WILLIAMSON,
individual,
Plaintiffs,

22
23

vs.

24

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP., a Domestic
Corporation; and SANDS AVIATION, LLC, a
Domestic Limited-Liability Company,

25
26
27
28

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-00880-JCM-VCF

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A
WRIT OF ATTACHMENT AND LIEN
SHOULD NOT ISSUE AGAINST LAS
VEGAS SANDS CORP. (ECF NO. 228)

1

Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Order to Show Cause Why a Writ of

2

Attachment and Lien Should Not Issue Against Las Vegas Sands Corp. (ECF No. 228) (“Motion”);

3

Defendants’ Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 235); Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of the Motion

4

(ECF No. 237); and Defendants’ Notice of Recent Additional Factual Support to its Opposition to

5

the Motion (ECF No. 243). The Court, having considered the parties’ briefings and oral argument

6

from counsel at the September 22, 2021 hearing on the Motion, finds that Plaintiffs have failed to

7

provide sufficient evidence to support a writ of attachment and lien against Las Vegas Sands Corp.

8

and therefore denies the Motion without prejudice.

10
11

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff’s
Motion be, and the same hereby is, DENIED, without prejudice.
September 29, 2021.
DATED __________________, 2021.

12
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

9

13

___________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2