Kennedy et al v. Las Vegas Sands Corp. et al

Filing 48

ORDER Granting 47 Stipulation to Continue Hearing (First Request) on Defendants' 20 MOTION to Strike re 1 Complaint. Motion Hearing reset for 8/11/2017 at 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/11/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Anthony L. Martin Nevada Bar No. 8177 anthony.martin@ogletreedeakins.com Dana B. Salmonson Nevada Bar No. 11180 dana.salmonson@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Fax: 702.369.6888 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Sands Corp. Sands Aviation, LLC, and Las Vegas Sands, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 12 SEAN KENNEDY, individual; ANDREW SNIDER, individual; CHRISTOPHER WARD, individual; RANDALL WESTON, individual; RONALD WILLIAMSON, individual, 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, vs. LAS VEGAS SAND CORP., a Domestic Corporation; SANDS AVIATION, LLC, a Domestic Limited-Liability Company; LAS VEGAS SANDS, LLC, a Domestic LimitedLiability Company; INTERFACE OPERATIONS, LLC, a Foreign LimitedLiability Company, 19 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00880-JCM-VCF STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT (First Request) Current Date: Current Time: Location: Judge: July 13, 2017 11:00 a.m. LV Courtroom 3D Magistrate Ferenbach Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiffs Sean Kennedy, Andrew Snider, Christopher Ward, Randall Weston, and Ronald 22 Williamson (collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Sands Aviation, LLC 23 24 (“Defendant”)1 by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to continue the 25 26 27 28 1 On July 5, 2017, the Court granted Defendants Motion for Partial Dismissal, without prejudice, dismissing Las Vegas Sands Corp. and Las Vegas Sands, LLC’s from this action. (ECF No. 46.) The Court also granted Defendant Interface Operations, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice, dismissing it from this action. (Id.) 1 hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Complaint (ECF No. 20) presently 2 scheduled for Thursday, July 13, 2017 at 11:00 a.m. This is the parties’ first request to continue 3 the hearing and is made at the request of counsel. Defendant’s counsel has a scheduling conflict, 4 and the request is not intended for purposes of delay. 5 6 Therefore, the parties request that the hearing be rescheduled for one of the following dates: August 2nd, 3rd, or 11th. 7 IS IT SO STIPULATED: 8 10 DATED this 11th day of July, 2017. DATED this 11th day of July, 2017. LAGOMARSINO LAW OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. /s/ Andre M. Lagomarsino Andre M. Lagomarsino Nevada Bar No. 6711 3005 West Horizon Ridge Parkway Suite 241 Henderson, NV 89052 /s/ Dana B. Salmonson Anthony L. Martin Nevada Bar No. 8177 Dana B. Salmonson Nevada Bar No. 11180 Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Sean Kennedy, Andrew Snider, Christopher Ward, Randall Weston , and Ronald Williamson Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Sands Corp. Sands Aviation, LLC, and Las Vegas Sands, LLC 18 19 ORDER 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of August 11, 2017 2:00 p Plaintiffs’ Complaint will be rescheduled for _________________ at ___ __.m. 23 24 25 26 ____________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE July 11, 2017 Dated 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?