Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 7920 Coral Point et al

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Stipulation to Stay Discovery; Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00907-RFB-GWF Document 23 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Edgar C. Smith, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5506 Robert A. Riether, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12076 7785 W. Sahara Ave, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 (702) 475-7967; Fax: (702) 946-1345 rriether@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE FIRST FRANKLIN MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2006-FF5, MORTGAGE PASS- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-FF5., a National Association, Case No.: 2:17-cv-00907-RFB-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 vs. SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 7920 CORAL POINT, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; TERRA WEST COLLECTIONS GROUP LLC d/b/a Assessment Management Services, a Nevada Limited Liability Company and SOUTH SHORES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, a Nevada Non-Profit Coop Corporation 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 Comes now, Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the 27 Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF5, Mortgage Pass-Through 28 Certificates, Series 2006-FF5 (“Deutsche”), Saticoy Bay LLC Series 7920 Coral Point, LLC Page 1 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-00907-RFB-GWF Document 23 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 4 1 2 (“Buyer”), and South Shores Community Association (“HOA”), by and through their respective attorneys of records, and hereby agree and stipulate as follows. 3 1. On March 31, 2017, Deutsche filed a Complaint (Docket No. 1). 4 2. HOA filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 26, 2017 (Docket No. 9), which is fully 5 briefed and pending with the Court. 6 7 3. Buyer filed a Motion to Dismiss on May 3, 2017 (Docket No. 11), which is fully 8 briefed and pending with the Court. 9 4. On June 9, 2017 this Court entered a Scheduling Order relating to the discovery plan 10 in this case (Docket No. 18), setting discovery cutoff for March 8, 2018. 11 5. Federal district courts have “wide discretion in controlling discovery.” Little v. City 12 13 of Seattle, 863 F.2d 681, 685 (9th Cir. 1988). 14 6. To determine if a stay is appropriate, the court considers (1) damage from the stay; 15 (2) hardship or inequity that befalls one party more than the other; and (3) the orderly 16 course of justice. See Dependable Highway Exp., Inc. v. Navigators Ins. Co., 498 17 18 F.3d 1059, 1066 (9th Cir. 2007) (setting forth factors). Here, the factors support a 19 stay of all proceedings based on the pending Motions to Dismiss as well as the 20 pending certified question to the Nevada Supreme Court in Bank of New York Mellon 21 v. Star Hill Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-2561-RFB-PAL/Nev. S. Ct. Case No. 22 729311. 23 24 7. The parties believe a stay is warranted because they will be able to avoid the cost of 25 expense of continued written discovery and depositions on issues that may be 26 1 27 28 Buyer believes the certified question relates to whether NRS §116.31168(1)’s incorporation of NRS §107.090 required a homeowner’s association to provide notices of default and/or sale to persons or entities holding a suborindate interest even when such persons or entities did not request notice, prior to the amendments that took effect on October 1, 2015 (Nev. S. Ct. Case No. 72931 (Order Accepting Certified Question, Directing Briefing and Directing Submissions of Filing Fee, filed June 13, 2017), ECF No. 41. Page 2 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-00907-RFB-GWF Document 23 Filed 01/11/18 Page 3 of 4 1 irrelevant based on the outcomes of the pending motions and on the aforementioned 2 certified question. Moreover, the Court will be relieved of expending further time 3 and effort considering any discovery-related motions or protective orders. 4 8. The parties agree there will be no significant hardship or inequity against any party, 5 6 and it is appropriate for this Court to exercise its power to grant a stay of discovery at 7 this time. A trial date has not yet been set and the outcome of the pending motions to 8 dismiss as well as the certified question will potentially result in resolution of the 9 entire case. 10 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that discovery 11 12 13 on the above-identified action should be stayed pending a decision from the Court on the pending motions to dismiss as well as the aforementioned certified question. 14 Consistent herewith, IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that any noticed 15 depositions are vacated, and deadlines for any pending written discovery are suspended until 16 further order of the Court. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DATED this 11th day of January, 2018. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP /s/ Robert A. Riether, Esq. __________ Robert A. Riether, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12076 7785 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF5 28 Page 3 of 4 Case 2:17-cv-00907-RFB-GWF Document 23 Filed 01/11/18 Page 4 of 4 1 2 DATED this 11th day of January, 2018. 3 LEACH JOHNSON SONG & GRUCHOW 4 /s/_Ryan D. Hastings, Esq. Ryan D. Hastings, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12394 8945 W. Russell Road, Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Attorneys for Defendant South Shores Community Association 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED this 11th day of January, 2018. 11 GEISENDORF & VILKIN, PLLC 12 /s/ Charles L. Geisendorf, Esq. Charles L. Geisendorf, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6985 2470 St. Rose Parkway, Ste. 309 Henderson, Nevada 89074 Attorneys for Defendant Saticoy Bay, LLC Series 7920 Coral Point 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 12th Dated this _____ day of _____________, 2018. January 21 22 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?