Federal Housing Finance Agency v. LVDG, LLC

Filing 30

ORDER re 1 Petition, 16 Motion, and 19 Cross-Motion. The parties must comply with the following on or before 9/18/2017: Respondent shall provided Petitioner with the Assessor's Parcel Number and street address of each property that Respondent and Respondent's affiliates have held or claimed an interest in and that was the subject of an HOA foreclosure between 9/18/2009 and the present. Respondent shall not be required at this time to provide the Petitioner with any other information requested in the subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 6 FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al., 7 8 9 Plaintiffs, 2:17-cv-00908-JAD-VCF ORDER vs. LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Defendant. 10 11 FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al., 12 13 14 ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Defendant. 15 16 2:17-cv-00909-GMN-VCF FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al., 17 2:17-cv-00911-GMN-VCF ORDER Plaintiffs, 18 19 vs. LVDG, LLC, Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. NEVADA NEW BUILDS, LLC, Defendant. 2:17-cv-00912-JAD-VCF ORDER 1 Before the Court are the following motions: 2 1. 2:17-cv-00908-JAD-VCF, Petition Of The Federal Housing Finance Agency For An Order 3 Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued In Furtherance Of Its Conservatorships Of Fannie Mae 4 And Freddie Mac (ECF No. 1), 5 2. 2:17-cv-00908-JAD-VCF, Cross-Motion for an Order Requiring Respondent to Comply with the 6 Subpoena and Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Quash (ECF No. 21), 7 3. 2:17-cv-00909-GMN-VCF, Petition Of The Federal Housing Finance Agency For An Order 8 Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued In Furtherance Of Its Conservatorships Of Fannie Mae 9 And Freddie Mac (ECF No. 1), 10 4. 2:17-cv-00909-GMN-VCF, Cross-Motion for an Order Requiring Respondent to Comply with the 11 Subpoena and Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Quash (ECF No. 17), 12 5. 2:17-cv-00909-GMN-VCF, Objection to Petition and Motion to Quash (ECF No. 18), 13 6. 2:17-cv-00911-GMN-VCF, Petition Of The Federal Housing Finance Agency For An Order 14 Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued In Furtherance Of Its Conservatorships Of Fannie Mae 15 And Freddie Mac (ECF No. 1), 16 7. 2:17-cv-00911-GMN-VCF, Objection to Petition and Motion to Quash (ECF No. 16), 17 8. 2:17-cv-00911-GMN-VCF, Cross-Motion for an Order Requiring Respondent to Comply with the 18 Subpoena and Memorandum in Opposition to Respondent’s Motion to Quash (ECF No. 19), 19 9. 2:17-cv-00912-JAD-VCF, Petition Of The Federal Housing Finance Agency For An Order 20 Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued In Furtherance Of Its Conservatorships Of Fannie Mae 21 And Freddie Mac (ECF No. 1), and, 22 23 24 25 10. 2:17-cv-00912-JAD-VCF, Motion for An Order Requiring Respondent to Comply with the Subpoena (ECF No. 15). 1 The Court held a hearing and heard representations from the parties. 2 Accordingly, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties must comply 3 with the following on or before September 18, 2017. 4 5 1. Respondent shall provided Petitioner with the Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN), and 6 street address (including unit number, if any, and city, state, and zip code) of each property 7 that Respondent and Respondent’s affiliates have held or claimed an interest in and that 8 was the subject of an HOA foreclosure completed under Nevada Revised Statute § 9 116.3116 between September 18, 2009 and the present. 10 2. Respondent shall not be required at this time to provide the Petitioner with any other 11 information requested in the subpoena. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated this 16th day of August, 2017. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?