Rael v. Berryhill

Filing 19

ORDER Granting 18 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 6 STEVEN W. MYHRE, CSBN 9635 Acting United States Attorney GINA TOMASELLI Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5602 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Gina.Tomaselli@ssa.gov 7 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA – LAS VEGAS DIVISION 9 10 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JERRI L. RAEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 CIVIL NO. 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Jerri L. Rael (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill, 19 Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record, 20 that Defendant shall have an extension of time of forty-five (45) days to deliver her Motion for 21 Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due 22 date is November 20, 2017. The new due date will be January 4, 2018. The parties further stipulate that 23 24 25 26 27 28 all other dates will be extended accordingly, and Plaintiff’s reply will be due to Defendant by January 24, 2018. This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant in the above-captioned matter. Defendant requests this extension because the attorney responsible for briefing this case was only recently assigned this case, has an unusually heavy workload this month, and is taking some leave time during the upcoming holidays. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF 1 1 2 3 4 5 proceedings. Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, Mark Barrett, who has no opposition to this motion, on November 16, 2017. It is therefore respectfully requested that Defendant be granted a forty-five (45) day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s motion, up to and including January 4, 2018. 6 7 8 Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 16, 2017 By: /s/ Mark D. Barrett * MARK D. BARRETT (*by email authorization on 11/16/17) Dated: November 16, 2017 STEVEN W. MYHRE Acting United States Attorney 9 10 11 12 14 By: /s/ Gina Tomaselli GINA TOMASELLI Special Assistant United States Attorney 15 Attorneys for Defendant 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: __________________________________ THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11-20-2017 DATE:__________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF 2 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT: I, Gina Tomaselli, certify that the following individual(s) were served with a copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME on the date and via the method of service identified below: 6 CM/ECF: 7 Mark D. Barrett Osterhout Berger Disability Law, LLC 521 Cedar Way, Ste. 200 Oakmont, PA 15139 412-794-8003 Fax: 412-794-8050 Email: Mark@mydisabilityattorney.com 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Hal Taylor 223 Marsh Avenue Reno, NV 89509 Email: haltaylorlawyer@gbis.com I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: November 16, 2017 18 STEVEN W. MYHRE Acting United States Attorney By: /s/ Gina Tomaselli GINA TOMASELLI Special Assistant United States Attorney 19 20 Attorneys for Defendant 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 16-cv-1181-JCM-CWH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?