Rael v. Berryhill
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 18 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
6
STEVEN W. MYHRE, CSBN 9635
Acting United States Attorney
GINA TOMASELLI
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-5602
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Gina.Tomaselli@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA – LAS VEGAS DIVISION
9
10
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JERRI L. RAEL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
CIVIL NO. 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Jerri L. Rael (Plaintiff) and Nancy A. Berryhill,
19
Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), by and through their respective counsel of record,
20
that Defendant shall have an extension of time of forty-five (45) days to deliver her Motion for
21
Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The current due
22
date is November 20, 2017. The new due date will be January 4, 2018. The parties further stipulate that
23
24
25
26
27
28
all other dates will be extended accordingly, and Plaintiff’s reply will be due to Defendant by January
24, 2018.
This is the first extension of time requested by Defendant in the above-captioned matter.
Defendant requests this extension because the attorney responsible for briefing this case was only
recently assigned this case, has an unusually heavy workload this month, and is taking some leave time
during the upcoming holidays. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the
Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF
1
1
2
3
4
5
proceedings. Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, Mark Barrett, who has no
opposition to this motion, on November 16, 2017. It is therefore respectfully requested that Defendant
be granted a forty-five (45) day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s motion, up to and including
January 4, 2018.
6
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 16, 2017
By: /s/ Mark D. Barrett *
MARK D. BARRETT
(*by email authorization on 11/16/17)
Dated: November 16, 2017
STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
9
10
11
12
14
By: /s/ Gina Tomaselli
GINA TOMASELLI
Special Assistant United States Attorney
15
Attorneys for Defendant
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
__________________________________
THE HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11-20-2017
DATE:__________________________
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:17-cv-00947-GMN-VCF
2
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT:
I, Gina Tomaselli, certify that the following individual(s) were served with a copy of the
foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME on the date and via the method
of service identified below:
6
CM/ECF:
7
Mark D. Barrett
Osterhout Berger Disability Law, LLC
521 Cedar Way, Ste. 200
Oakmont, PA 15139
412-794-8003
Fax: 412-794-8050
Email: Mark@mydisabilityattorney.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Hal Taylor
223 Marsh Avenue
Reno, NV 89509
Email: haltaylorlawyer@gbis.com
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: November 16, 2017
18
STEVEN W. MYHRE
Acting United States Attorney
By: /s/ Gina Tomaselli
GINA TOMASELLI
Special Assistant United States Attorney
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 16-cv-1181-JCM-CWH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?