Geico Casualty Company v. Schneider et al

Filing 53

ORDER granting 52 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JAMES P.C. SILVESTRI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3603 PYATT SILVESTRI 701 Bridger Avenue, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 383-6000 (702) 477-0088 (fax) jsilvestri@pyattsilvestri.com 5 6 Attorney for Defendant, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, a Maryland CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00961-APG-VCF Company; plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 PAUL SCHNEIDER, individually; KIMBERLY SCHNEIDER, individually; and CASANDRA SCHNEIDER, individually, 14 Defendants. 15 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, 18 through their respective counsel of record, that the above-referenced matter shall be dismissed, 19 with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. 20 PYATT SILVESTRI LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON /s/ James P.C. Silvestri JAMES P.C. SILVESTRI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3603 701 Bridger Avenue, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 jsilvestri@pyattsilvestri.com Attorney for Defendant, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY /s/ David F. Sampson DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6811 200 E. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89104 david@davidsampsonlaw.com Attorney for Defendants 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pyatt Silvestri /// /// 701 E. Bridger Avenue Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 383-6000 1 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00961-APG-VCF Geico Casualty Company v. Schneider STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, it is hereby: 3 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-referenced matter be, and the 4 same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. 5 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: August 16, 2018. 6 7 8 SUBMITTED BY: PYATT SILVESTRI 9 10 11 12 13 /s/ James P.C. Silvestri JAMES P.C. SILVESTRI, ESQ. 701 Bridger Avenue, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 jsilvestri@pyattsilvestri.com Attorney for Defendant, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pyatt Silvestri 701 E. Bridger Avenue Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 383-6000 2 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00961-APG-VCF Geico Casualty Company v. Schneider STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING 1 2 I hereby attest and certify that on, August 15, 2018, I received concurrence from 3 Defendants’ counsel, David F. Sampson, Esq., to file this document with his electronic signature 4 attached. 5 6 7 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this 15th day of August, 2018. /s/ James P.C. Silvestri JAMES P.C. SILVESTRI Nevada Bar No. 3603 8 9 10 11 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 12 Pursuant to FRCP 5(b), I hereby certify that I am an employee of PYATT SILVESTRI, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 and that on the 15th day of August, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING HEARING TO DISCUSS THE SCHEDULING AND DETAILS OF A TRIAL PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 45 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following: David F. Sampson, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON 200 E. Charleston Blvd. Las Vegas, NV 89104 david@davidsampsonlaw.com Attorney for Defendants 21 22 23 /s/ Barbara Abbott An employee of PYATT SILVESTRI 24 25 26 27 28 Pyatt Silvestri 701 E. Bridger Avenue Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 383-6000 3 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-00961-APG-VCF Geico Casualty Company v. Schneider STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?