Zimmerman v. Walgreen Co

Filing 9

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Zimmerman v. Walgreen Co. (case number 2:17-cv-00993-JCM-GWF) be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 KEVIN ZIMMERMAN, Case No. 2:17-CV-993 JCM (GWF) 8 9 10 Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. WALGREEN CO., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 14 Presently before the court is the matter of Zimmerman v. Walgreen Co., case number 2:17cv-00993-JCM-GWF. 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides: “If a defendant is not served within 90 days 16 after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must 17 dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a 18 specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 19 The underlying action was filed on April 6, 2017. On July 12, 2017, pursuant to Federal 20 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the clerk of court filed a notice of intent to dismiss if plaintiff did 21 not provide proof of service by August 11, 2017. (ECF No. 8). To date, plaintiff has not 22 demonstrated proof of service on defendant. Dismissal pursuant to 4(m) is proper. 23 Accordingly, 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Zimmerman v. Walgreen Co. (case number 2:17-cv- 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 00993-JCM-GWF) be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED September 21, 2017. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?