Mueller v. Desert Palace, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER re 28 Notice of Service of Initial Disclosures and Discovery. That notice should not have been filed and is hereby STRICKEN. Touch and its counsel are again INSTRUCTED to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
SCOTT MUELLER,

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

On June 21, 2017, Defendant Touch, LLC filed a notice of service of initial disclosures and

17

discovery, Docket No. 23, which the Court struck as improperly filed on the docket. Docket No. 24

18

(citing Local Rule 26-8 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)). The Court instructed “the parties to refrain

19

from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.”

20

Id. On July 7, 2017, Touch filed a notice of service of supplemental disclosures. Docket No. 28.

21

For the reasons already explained, that notice should not have been filed and is hereby STRICKEN.

22

Touch and its counsel are again INSTRUCTED to refrain from filing discovery documents

23

on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. Failure to comply with this order

24

may result in the imposition of sanctions.

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
DESERT PALACE, INC., et al.,
14
Defendant(s).

25

ORDER
(Docket No. 28)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Case No. 2:17-cv-00999-APG-NJK

Dated: July 7, 2017

27
28

NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge