2233 Paradise Road, LLC v. Lori Scialabba et al
Filing
13
ORDER Granting 12 Request for Relief Setting Initial Case Conference Management Deadlines and Proposed Briefing Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
David B. Gardner (CA Bar no. 89541)
Law Offices of David B. Gardner, Inc.
6300 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Tel. (323) 653-4514
Fax. (323) 651-5938
Email: david@americanimmigrationlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
Nathalie Gottschalk (NV Bar no. 9109)
Law Offices of Nathalie Gottschalk PLLC
9550 S Eastern Avenue, Suite 253-A186
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Tel. (702) 380-6805
Email: lawyer@gottschalk.us
Associated local counsel
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
12
THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
14
2233 PARADISE ROAD, LLC
DBA CASH FACTORY USA;
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
15
16
PLAINTIFF,
vs.
17
18
19
JAMES MCCAMENT , et al.,
20
DEFENDANTS.
21
22
23
Case No. 2:17-cv-01018-ACG-VCF
REQUEST FOR RELIEF SETTING
INITIAL CASE CONFERENCE
MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
AND PROPOSED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND ORDER
THE HONORABLE
ANDREW P. GORDON
24
Plaintiff 2233 Paradise Road, LLC dba Cash Factory USA and Federal Defendants, through
25
undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), hereby submit this request for relief
26
from the Order Setting Initial Case Management Deadlines. In support of this application,
27
the parties state as follows:
28
1. Plaintiff’s Complaint seeks judicial review on an administrative record pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
1
1
2
§ 706 (the Administrative Procedure Act).
The Court’s role is limited to a review of the administrative record. As such, the parties in this
3
case are exempt from initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B)(i)
4
5
and discovery is not available in this matter. Because this matter involves only a review of the
6
administrative record, the parties have agreed that this matter can be fully resolved by the
7
submission of a proposed briefing schedule in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1) and
8
the filings of motions for summary judgment pursuant to Local Rule 56-1.
9
10
The parties therefore request relief from filing a Rule 26(f) Report and Case Management
11
Statement, and do not believe that an initial case management conference applies to this case.
12
In lieu of a case management conference, the parties propose the following schedule for
13
submission of briefs in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1).
14
Proposed Briefing Schedule
15
16
1. Deadline for Filing Agency Administrative Record(s): On or before 60 days after the entry of
17
the Court’s Brief Scheduling Order. Federal Defendants have agreed to file the administrative
18
record with the Court and provide Plaintiff a CD-ROM of the administrative record in a word-
19
searchable PDF format.
20
21
2. Deadline to File Motions to Supplement Agency Record(s): The parties will attempt to
22
resolve informally any issues relating to the scope and contents of the administrative record.
23
Any motion to supplement the administrative record, or concerning the scope or contents of, the
24
administrative record (“motion to supplement”) must be filed 30 days after Defendants file the
25
administrative record. In the event a motion to supplement the record is filed, the parties hereby
26
27
28
agree that the Federal Defendants’ responsive brief is due within 14 days after the filing of
Plaintiff’s motion to supplement. The movant’s reply brief is due within 14 days of the date
2
1
2
Federal Defendants’ response brief is filed. Plaintiff shall use their best efforts to coordinate their
filing of any motion(s) to supplement and Federal Defendants may, in their discretion, file one
3
consolidated response to any motions to supplement the record.
4
5
3. In the event the Court grants Plaintiff’s request to supplement the record, Plaintiff’s Motion
6
for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the record is supplemented.
7
in favor of Federal Defendants, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the
8
Should the Court rule
Court’s Order.
9
4. In the event there are no motions to supplement the record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
10
11
Judgment is due 50 days after Federal Defendants file the administrative record.
12
Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion is due 30 days after Plaintiff’s filing of its Motion for
13
Summary Judgment.
14
Plaintiff’s Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion.
15
Defendants’ Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply.
16
17
5. The parties agree that the Court, in its discretion, may alter or amend the proposed Scheduling
18
Order and that no party has waived or surrendered its right to seek such alteration or amendment
19
by the Court.
20
6. The parties do not propose a date for hearing on the motions, in compliance with Local Rule
21
78-1. However, the parties will be prepared to present oral arguments on the issues discussed in
22
23
the briefs if it will assist the Court. A Proposed Order is attached.
24
Dated this _____ day of July, 2017
25
26
Respectfully submitted,
27
/s/ David B. Gardner
David B. Gardner, Esq (CA: 89541)
28
3
1
Law Offices of David Gardner
6300 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Telephone (805) 458-1002
Email:david@americanimmigrationlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
6
/s/ Nathalie Gottschalk
Nathalie Gottschalk, Esq (NV: 9109)
Law Offices of Nathalie Gottschalk PLLC.
9550 S Eastern Avenue, Suite 253-A186
Las Vegas, Nevada 89123
Tel. (702) 380-6805
Email: lawyer@gottschalk.us
Associated local counsel
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
/s/ Samuel Go (with permission)
Senior Litigation Counsel
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Tel: (202) 353-9923
Fax: (202) 305-7000
Email: samuel.go@usdoj.gov
Attorney for Defendants
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
[PROPOSED] BRIEF SCHEDULING ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B)(i), the parties are relieved from the
23
obligation to file a Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement, and the Initial Case
24
25
Management Conference. The parties shall adhere to the following schedule in filing briefs with
26
the Court in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1):
27
1. Defendants shall file the administrative record within 60 days after the entry of the Court’s
28
Brief Scheduling Order.
4
1
2
2. In the event the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the Record, Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the record is supplemented. Should the Court rule in
3
favor of Federal Defendants, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the
4
5
Court’s Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the Record.
6
3. In the event there are no Motions to Supplement the Record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
7
Judgment is due 50 days after Federal Defendants file the administrative record.
8
Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion is due 30 days after Plaintiff’s filing of its Motion for
9
Summary Judgment.
10
11
12
4. Plaintiff’s Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion.
5. Defendants’ Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply.
13
14
SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
July
25th
DATED this _____ of ____________, 2017
18
19
_________________________________
HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?