2233 Paradise Road, LLC v. Lori Scialabba et al

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Request for Relief Setting Initial Case Conference Management Deadlines and Proposed Briefing Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 David B. Gardner (CA Bar no. 89541) Law Offices of David B. Gardner, Inc. 6300 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Tel. (323) 653-4514 Fax. (323) 651-5938 Email: david@americanimmigrationlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 Nathalie Gottschalk (NV Bar no. 9109) Law Offices of Nathalie Gottschalk PLLC 9550 S Eastern Avenue, Suite 253-A186 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Tel. (702) 380-6805 Email: lawyer@gottschalk.us Associated local counsel Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 12 THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 14 2233 PARADISE ROAD, LLC DBA CASH FACTORY USA; ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 PLAINTIFF, vs. 17 18 19 JAMES MCCAMENT , et al., 20 DEFENDANTS. 21 22 23 Case No. 2:17-cv-01018-ACG-VCF REQUEST FOR RELIEF SETTING INITIAL CASE CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER THE HONORABLE ANDREW P. GORDON 24 Plaintiff 2233 Paradise Road, LLC dba Cash Factory USA and Federal Defendants, through 25 undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), hereby submit this request for relief 26 from the Order Setting Initial Case Management Deadlines. In support of this application, 27 the parties state as follows: 28 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint seeks judicial review on an administrative record pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1 1 2 § 706 (the Administrative Procedure Act). The Court’s role is limited to a review of the administrative record. As such, the parties in this 3 case are exempt from initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B)(i) 4 5 and discovery is not available in this matter. Because this matter involves only a review of the 6 administrative record, the parties have agreed that this matter can be fully resolved by the 7 submission of a proposed briefing schedule in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1) and 8 the filings of motions for summary judgment pursuant to Local Rule 56-1. 9 10 The parties therefore request relief from filing a Rule 26(f) Report and Case Management 11 Statement, and do not believe that an initial case management conference applies to this case. 12 In lieu of a case management conference, the parties propose the following schedule for 13 submission of briefs in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1). 14 Proposed Briefing Schedule 15 16 1. Deadline for Filing Agency Administrative Record(s): On or before 60 days after the entry of 17 the Court’s Brief Scheduling Order. Federal Defendants have agreed to file the administrative 18 record with the Court and provide Plaintiff a CD-ROM of the administrative record in a word- 19 searchable PDF format. 20 21 2. Deadline to File Motions to Supplement Agency Record(s): The parties will attempt to 22 resolve informally any issues relating to the scope and contents of the administrative record. 23 Any motion to supplement the administrative record, or concerning the scope or contents of, the 24 administrative record (“motion to supplement”) must be filed 30 days after Defendants file the 25 administrative record. In the event a motion to supplement the record is filed, the parties hereby 26 27 28 agree that the Federal Defendants’ responsive brief is due within 14 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s motion to supplement. The movant’s reply brief is due within 14 days of the date 2 1 2 Federal Defendants’ response brief is filed. Plaintiff shall use their best efforts to coordinate their filing of any motion(s) to supplement and Federal Defendants may, in their discretion, file one 3 consolidated response to any motions to supplement the record. 4 5 3. In the event the Court grants Plaintiff’s request to supplement the record, Plaintiff’s Motion 6 for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the record is supplemented. 7 in favor of Federal Defendants, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the 8 Should the Court rule Court’s Order. 9 4. In the event there are no motions to supplement the record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 10 11 Judgment is due 50 days after Federal Defendants file the administrative record. 12 Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion is due 30 days after Plaintiff’s filing of its Motion for 13 Summary Judgment. 14 Plaintiff’s Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Defendant’s Opposition and Cross-Motion. 15 Defendants’ Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply. 16 17 5. The parties agree that the Court, in its discretion, may alter or amend the proposed Scheduling 18 Order and that no party has waived or surrendered its right to seek such alteration or amendment 19 by the Court. 20 6. The parties do not propose a date for hearing on the motions, in compliance with Local Rule 21 78-1. However, the parties will be prepared to present oral arguments on the issues discussed in 22 23 the briefs if it will assist the Court. A Proposed Order is attached. 24 Dated this _____ day of July, 2017 25 26 Respectfully submitted, 27 /s/ David B. Gardner David B. Gardner, Esq (CA: 89541) 28 3 1 Law Offices of David Gardner 6300 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90048 Telephone (805) 458-1002 Email:david@americanimmigrationlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 6 /s/ Nathalie Gottschalk Nathalie Gottschalk, Esq (NV: 9109) Law Offices of Nathalie Gottschalk PLLC. 9550 S Eastern Avenue, Suite 253-A186 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 Tel. (702) 380-6805 Email: lawyer@gottschalk.us Associated local counsel Attorney for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 /s/ Samuel Go (with permission) Senior Litigation Counsel United States Department of Justice Civil Division Office of Immigration Litigation District Court Section P.O Box 868, Ben Franklin Station Tel: (202) 353-9923 Fax: (202) 305-7000 Email: samuel.go@usdoj.gov Attorney for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [PROPOSED] BRIEF SCHEDULING ORDER Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B)(i), the parties are relieved from the 23 obligation to file a Rule 26(f) Report and Joint Case Management Statement, and the Initial Case 24 25 Management Conference. The parties shall adhere to the following schedule in filing briefs with 26 the Court in accordance with Local Rule 16-1(c)(1): 27 1. Defendants shall file the administrative record within 60 days after the entry of the Court’s 28 Brief Scheduling Order. 4 1 2 2. In the event the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the Record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the record is supplemented. Should the Court rule in 3 favor of Federal Defendants, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due 30 days after the 4 5 Court’s Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement the Record. 6 3. In the event there are no Motions to Supplement the Record, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 7 Judgment is due 50 days after Federal Defendants file the administrative record. 8 Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion is due 30 days after Plaintiff’s filing of its Motion for 9 Summary Judgment. 10 11 12 4. Plaintiff’s Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion. 5. Defendants’ Reply is due 20 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s Reply. 13 14 SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 July 25th DATED this _____ of ____________, 2017 18 19 _________________________________ HONORABLE CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?