Foley v. Teuton et al
Filing
79
ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:17-cv-01024-JCM-VCF Document 79 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
MICHAEL FOLEY,
8
Plaintiff(s),
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-1024 JCM (VCF)
ORDER
v.
SYLVIA TEUTON, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
Presently before the court is plaintiff Michael Foley’s motion to dismiss defendant Clark
County Detention Center (“CCDC”). (ECF No. 77).
15
This matter was initiated on April 10, 2017. (ECF No. 1). Having been affirmed at the
16
Ninth Circuit, this court ordered the remaining parties, plaintiff Michael Foley and defendant Clark
17
County Detention Center, to file a status report with how this case is expected to proceed. (ECF
18
No. 75).
19
On August 13, 2020, former defendant Joseph Lombardo timely filed a status report,
20
arguing that this case is ripe for dismissal because “(1) CCDC is not an individual or an entity,
21
only a building; (2) the proper party is LVMPD which was not named in the Complaint; (3)
22
Plaintiff failed to take any timely steps to serve ‘CCDC’; and (4) Plaintiff never sought to amend
23
his Complaint to name LVMPD.” (ECF No. 76). Plaintiff Michael Foley filed no status report or
24
response.
25
Indeed, the record shows that the CCDC’s summons was returned unexecuted on January
26
5, 2018. (ECF No. 41). In over two years, plaintiff has made no efforts to remedy this defect in
27
service nor appropriately amend his complaint.
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Case 2:17-cv-01024-JCM-VCF Document 79 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 2
1
On September 9, 2020, plaintiff filed the instant motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 77). Plaintiff
2
seeks to dismiss the remaining defendant, conceding that “this court will not recognize an
3
inanimate object like [CCDC].” (Id.). Plaintiff construes Lombardo’s status report as non-
4
opposition, and this court will too. (ECF No. 75).
5
In light of the foregoing, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the remaining
6
defendant CCDC. See Kile v. N. Pac. Const. Co., 919 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1990) (“The district court
7
did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the international union sua sponte for lack of service of
8
process five years after filing the complaint.”). Now having resolved all claims against all
9
defendants, this matter is hereby closed.
10
Accordingly,
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff Michael Foley’s
12
motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, GRANTED. (ECF No. 77).
13
The clerk is ordered to close this case.
14
DATED September 10, 2020.
15
16
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?