Guardado v. State of Nevada Ex Rel et al
Filing
7
ORDER this action shall proceed on the retaliation claim against Guice and Bryant. This action is STAYED 90 days. FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney Generals Office shall advise the Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this order whether it will enter a limited notice of appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
ERNEST JORD GUARDADO,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01072-JAD-VCF
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
ORDER
v.
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
I.
DISCUSSION
16
On May 9, 2018, the Court issued a screening order dismissing some claims with
17
prejudice, dismissing other claims without prejudice, and permitting one claim to proceed.
18
(See ECF No. 5). The Court granted Plaintiff until June 9, 2018 to file an amended
19
complaint curing the deficiencies of his complaint. (Id. at 13). The Court specifically
20
stated that if Plaintiff chose not to file an amended complaint, the action would proceed
21
on the retaliation claim against Guice and Bryant. (Id.). Plaintiff has not filed an amended
22
complaint. Pursuant to the screening order, this action shall proceed on the retaliation
23
claim against Guice and Bryant.
24
II.
CONCLUSION
25
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the Court’s screening
26
order (ECF No. 5), this action shall proceed on the retaliation claim against Guice and
27
Bryant.
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that given the nature of the claim(s) that the Court has
1
permitted to proceed, this action is STAYED for ninety (90) days to allow Plaintiff and
2
Defendant(s) an opportunity to settle their dispute before the $350.00 filing fee is paid, an
3
answer is filed, or the discovery process begins. During this ninety-day stay period, no
4
other pleadings or papers shall be filed in this case, and the parties shall not engage in
5
any discovery. The Court will refer this case to the Court’s Inmate Early Mediation
6
Program, and the Court will enter a subsequent order. Regardless, on or before ninety
7
(90) days from the date this order is entered, the Office of the Attorney General shall file
8
the report form attached to this order regarding the results of the 90-day stay, even if a
9
stipulation for dismissal is entered prior to the end of the 90-day stay. If the parties
10
proceed with this action, the Court will then issue an order setting a date for Defendants
11
to file an answer or other response. Following the filing of an answer, the Court will issue
12
a scheduling order setting discovery and dispositive motion deadlines.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that “settlement” may or may not include payment of
14
money damages. It also may or may not include an agreement to resolve Plaintiff’s issues
15
differently. A compromise agreement is one in which neither party is completely satisfied
16
with the result, but both have given something up and both have obtained something in
17
return.
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if the case does not settle, Plaintiff will be required
19
to pay the full $350.00 filing fee. This fee cannot be waived. If Plaintiff is allowed to
20
proceed in forma pauperis, the fee will be paid in installments from his prison trust
21
account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). If Plaintiff is not allowed to proceed in forma pauperis, the
22
$350.00 will be due immediately.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party seeks to have this case excluded from
24
the inmate mediation program, that party shall file a “motion to exclude case from
25
mediation” on or before twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order. The responding
26
party shall have seven (7) days to file a response. No reply shall be filed. Thereafter, the
27
Court will issue an order, set the matter for hearing, or both.
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE
-2-
1
a copy of this order, the original screening order (ECF No. 5) and a copy of Plaintiff’s
2
complaint (ECF No. 6) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, by
3
adding the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to the docket sheet. This does not
4
indicate acceptance of service.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General’s Office shall advise the
6
Court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of the entry of this order whether it will enter
7
a limited notice of appearance on behalf of Defendants for the purpose of settlement. No
8
defenses or objections, including lack of service, shall be waived as a result of the filing
9
of the limited notice of appearance.
10
11
20th
DATED THIS ___ day of June 2018.
12
13
United States Magistrate Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
ERNEST JORD GUARDADO,
Plaintiff,
11
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
REPORT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
RE: RESULTS OF 90-DAY STAY
v.
12
13
Case No. 2:17-cv-01072-JAD-VCF
NOTE: ONLY THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SHALL FILE THIS FORM.
THE INMATE PLAINTIFF SHALL NOT FILE THIS FORM.
16
17
On ________________ [the date of the issuance of the screening order], the Court
18
issued its screening order stating that it had conducted its screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
19
§ 1915A, and that certain specified claims in this case would proceed. The Court ordered
20
the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to file a report ninety (90) days
21
after the date of the entry of the Court’s screening order to indicate the status of the case
22
at the end of the 90-day stay. By filing this form, the Office of the Attorney General hereby
23
complies.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
REPORT FORM
[Identify which of the following two situations (identified in bold type) describes the case,
and follow the instructions corresponding to the proper statement.]
Situation One: Mediated Case: The case was assigned to mediation by a courtappointed mediator during the 90-day stay. [If this statement is accurate, check ONE
of the six statements below and fill in any additional information as required, then proceed
to the signature block.]
____ A mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held on
_______________ [enter date], and as of this date, the parties have
reached a settlement (even if paperwork to memorialize the settlement
remains to be completed). (If this box is checked, the parties are on notice
that they must SEPARATELY file either a contemporaneous stipulation of
dismissal or a motion requesting that the Court continue the stay in the case
until a specified date upon which they will file a stipulation of dismissal.)
____ A mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held on
________________ [enter date], and as of this date, the parties have not
reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney General therefore informs
the Court of its intent to proceed with this action.
____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the
90-day stay, but the parties have nevertheless settled the case. (If this box
is checked, the parties are on notice that they must SEPARATELY file a
contemporaneous stipulation of dismissal or a motion requesting that the
Court continue the stay in this case until a specified date upon which they
will file a stipulation of dismissal.)
____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the
90-day stay, but one is currently scheduled for ________________ [enter
date].
____ No mediation session with a court-appointed mediator was held during the
90-day stay, and as of this date, no date certain has been scheduled for
such a session.
21
____ None of the above five statements describes the status of this case.
Contemporaneously with the filing of this report, the Office of the Attorney
General of the State of Nevada is filing a separate document detailing the
status of this case.
22
*****
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
Situation Two: Informal Settlement Discussions Case: The case was NOT assigned
to mediation with a court-appointed mediator during the 90-day stay; rather, the
parties were encouraged to engage in informal settlement negotiations. [If this
statement is accurate, check ONE of the four statements below and fill in any additional
information as required, then proceed to the signature block.]
____ The parties engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date, the
parties have reached a settlement (even if the paperwork to memorialize
the settlement remains to be completed). (If this box is checked, the parties
are on notice that they must SEPARATELY file either a contemporaneous
stipulation of dismissal or a motion requesting that the Court continue the
stay in this case until a specified date upon which they will file a stipulation
-5-
of dismissal.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
____ The parties engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date, the
parties have not reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney General
therefore informs the Court of its intent to proceed with this action.
____ The parties have not engaged in settlement discussions and as of this date,
the parties have not reached a settlement. The Office of the Attorney
General therefore informs the Court of its intent to proceed with this action.
8
____ None of the above three statements fully describes the status of this case.
Contemporaneously with the filing of this report, the Office of the Attorney
General of the State of Nevada is filing a separate document detailing the
status of this case.
9
Submitted this _______ day of __________________, ______ by:
7
10
11
12
Attorney Name: _______________________
Print
_________________________
Signature
Address:
Phone:
______________________
13
14
___________________________
______________________
Email:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-6-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?