Turner v. NDOC et al

Filing 9

ORDER Granting Petitioner's 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall file and electronically serve the 1 -1 petition on the respondents, for informational purposes only. The Clerk shall add Adam Paul L axalt, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Petitioner's 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, 5 Motion for Court Order, 6 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, 7 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, and 8 Motion for Relief are Denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 JOHN TURNER, Case No. 2:17-cv-01084-RFB-VCF 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 12 NEVADA DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS, et al., OF 13 Respondents. 14 15 Petitioner John Turner has submitted a pro se habeas corpus petition (ECF No. 1- 16 1). His application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) shall be granted. The 17 petition shall be dismissed without prejudice because Turner’s state-court proceedings 18 are ongoing, and he has not exhausted his claims. 19 A federal court will not grant a state prisoner’s petition for habeas relief until the 20 prisoner has exhausted his available state remedies for all claims raised. Rose v. Lundy, 21 455 U.S. 509 (1982); 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). A petitioner must give the state courts a fair 22 opportunity to act on each of his claims before he presents those claims in a federal 23 habeas petition. O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 844 (1999); see also Duncan v. 24 Henry, 513 U.S. 364, 365 (1995). A claim remains unexhausted until the petitioner has 25 given the highest available state court the opportunity to consider the claim through direct 26 appeal or state collateral review proceedings. See Casey v. Moore, 386 F.3d 896, 916 27 (9th Cir. 2004); Garrison v. McCarthey, 653 F.2d 374, 376 (9th Cir. 1981). 28 1 1 Here, petitioner has attached documents from his state postconviction 2 proceedings. The court may also take notice of the dockets of the Nevada Supreme 3 Court and the Nevada Court of Appeals. Taken together, they reflect that Turner’s appeal 4 of the denial of his state postconviction petition is pending before the Nevada Court of 5 Appeals (see ECF No. 1-1, p. 32, 37; Nevada Court of Appeals Case No. 72602). The 6 resolution of Turner’s state postconviction petition could render a federal habeas petition 7 moot. Accordingly, this federal petition shall be dismissed without prejudice to petitioner 8 filing a new federal habeas petition, in a new case with a new case number and a new, 9 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis with the required financial 10 information. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s application for leave to proceed 11 12 in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. 13 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1-1) on the respondents, for informational purposes only. 15 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents. 17 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as set forth in this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel 19 20 (ECF No. 4), motion for court order (ECF No. 5), motion for appointment of counsel 21 (ECF No. 6), motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 7), and motion for relief (ECF No. 22 8) are DENIED as moot. 23 ... 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and 3 close this case. 4 5 DATED: 19 December 2017. 6 7 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?