Martino v. BMO Harris Bank, National Association et al

Filing 11

ORDER Denying 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). See Local Rule IA 6-1(a) (requests to extend must state the reason(s) for the extension sought). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Case 2:17-cv-01110-GMN-NJK Document 10 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 2

1

5

Kelly H. Dove, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 10569)
Karl O. Riley, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 12077)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11

JOHN P. MARTINO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

v.
BMO HARRIS BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; CHASE BANK USA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; ONE
NEVADA CREDIT UNION; WELLS
FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,

18

Case No.:

2:17-cv-01110-GMN-NJK

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST]

Defendants.

19
20

Plaintiff John P. Martino (“Plaintiff”), and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells

21

Fargo,” together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate to

22

extend the time for Wells Fargo to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

23

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint on April 21, 2017;

24

WHEREAS, this is the first request to continue response to complaint;

25

WHEREAS, it is unknown as to when Plaintiff served Wells Fargo; thus, this request is

26
27
28

timely;
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo requested, and Plaintiff agreed, to extend Wells Fargo’s time to
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint;
-1-

Case 2:17-cv-01110-GMN-NJK Document 10 Filed 05/22/17 Page 2 of 2

1

WHEREAS this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause;

2

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS

3
4

HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties as follows:
1.

Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June 9, 2017.

5

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

6

DATED: May 22, 2017.

DATED: May 22, 2017.

By: /s/ David Krieger
David Krieger
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Henderson, NV 89123
Tel: [phone]

By: /s/ Karl O. Riley
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Karl O. Riley, Esq.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite
1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Tel: [phone]

7
8
9
10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11
12

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A.

13
14
15

ORDER

16

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before
DENIED. See Local Rule IA 6-1(a) (requests to extend must state
June 9, 2017. the reason(s) for the extension sought).

17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20

May 23
DATED: __________________, 2017.

21

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23

4849-7272-1737

24
25
26
27
28
-2-