Martino v. BMO Harris Bank, National Association et al
ORDER. The Court STRIKES the document filed at Docket No. 23 and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order to do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOHN P. MARTINO,
On June 30, 2017, Defendant BMO Harris filed a notice of service of discovery. Docket No.
23.1 Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule
26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered by the Court in this case.
Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the document filed at Docket No. 23 and instructs the parties to
refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order to do so.
BMO HARRIS BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
(Docket No. 23)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Case No. 2:17-cv-01110-GMN-NJK
Dated: June 30, 2017
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
The notice erroneously states that “Plaintiffs certify” that they served the discovery, see
Docket No. 23 at 1, but the document was filed by the attorneys for Defendant BMO Harris, see id.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?