Premier One Holdings, Inc. v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Decision on 10 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MORRIS LAW CENTER
SARAH A. MORRIS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8461
sarah@morrislawcenter.com
DAVID J. ROTHENBERG, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13576
david@morrislawcenter.com
6085 W. Twain Ave., Suite 201
Las Vegas, Nevada 89103
Telephone: (702) 850-7798
Facsimile: (702) 850-7998
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS,
Nevada corporation,
Plaintiff
INC.,
a
Case No.:
vs.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, a foreign
limited liability company, ROXEY A.
RANFTL; DOES 1-100, inclusive, and ROES
1-100, inclusive,
Defendants.
2:17-cv-01133-RFB-NJK
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
STAY CASE PENDING DECISION
ON MOTION TO REMAND
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff, Premier One Holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) by and through its attorneys of
record, Sarah A. Morris, Esq. and David J. Rothenberg, Esq. of the law firm Morris Law
Center and Defendant, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC by and through its attorneys of
record, Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. and Regina A. Habermas, Esq. of the law firm Wright,
Finlay, & Zak, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree to stay the above-captioned action
pending a decision on Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (ECF No. 10) as follows:
25
26
28
1
8045 Astrology Court
1
1.
This is a quiet title action arising from an HOA foreclosure sale (the
2
“Sale”) of a residential property located at 8045 Astrology Court Unit 101, Las Vegas,
3
Nevada 89128 (the “Property”).
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2.
Plaintiff originally brought this matter in the Eighth Judicial District Court
of Nevada (A-17-752728-C).
3.
Defendant Nationstar was served with the Complaint and removed this
matter to Federal Court.
4.
On May 25, 2017 Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10), which
would fully remove this matter from this Court if granted.
5.
Whether this matter is brought in state or federal court would affect the
11
applicable law resulting in a potential waste of judicial resources as well as the resources
12
of both parties from engaging in discovery if remanded.
13
14
15
16
17
18
6.
The Parties request a stay of litigation until this Court has ruled on the
pending Motion to Remand as it would be dispositive of this action in this Court.
7.
The Parties agree to submit a renewed discovery schedule within 30 days
of this Court’s ruling in the event this matter is not remanded.
Dated: September 5th 2017.
MORRIS LAW CENTER
WRIGHT, FINLAY, & ZAK, LLP
By:/s/ Sarah A. Morris
Sarah A. Morris, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8461
David J. Rothenberg, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13576
Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: /s/ Regina A. Habermas
Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 0050
Regina A. Habermas, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8481
Attorneys for Defendant, Nationstar
Mortgage, LLC
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
2
8045 Astrology Court
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and based upon the foregoing stipulation
of the parties:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that litigation in this case is stayed until the Court
rules on the pending Motion to Remand (ECF No. 10).
6
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties will file a renewed
7
discovery schedule within 30 days of this Court’s ruling in the event this matter is not
8
remanded.
9
UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
October 12, 2017.
Date:________________________
12
13
Respectfully Submitted:
14
MORRIS LAW CENTER
15
16
17
18
19
By:/s/ Sarah A. Morris
Sarah A. Morris, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8461
David J. Rothenberg, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13576
Attorneys for Plaintiff
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
3
8045 Astrology Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?