Zimmerman v. PetSmart, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). PetSmart, Inc. answer due 6/8/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Kelly H. Dove
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Michael Paretti
Nevada Bar No. 13926
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11

Jean F. Kuei
Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed
REED SMITH LLP
1301 K. Street, N.W.
Suite 1000 – East Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.414.9299
Email: [e-mail]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
15

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Kevin Zimmerman, and individual,

16

Case No. 2:17-cv-01190-GMN-GWF

Plaintiff,

17
18

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

vs.
PetSmart, Inc.,

19

Defendant.

(FIRST REQUEST)

20
21

Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, PetSmart, Inc. (“PetSmart”) by

22

and through their undersigned counsel (collectively the “Parties”), for good cause shown, hereby

23

stipulate and agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc #1] to

24

June 8, 2017. This is the Parties’ first extension request.

25
26

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) and Local Rule 6-1, there exists good
cause to grant this extension to respond for the following reasons:

27

1.

Plaintiff served the Complaint and Summons on PetSmart on May 4, 2017.

28

2.

PetSmart’s Answer is currently due May 25, 2017.

1
2

3.

In addition, the Parties are engaging in settlement and early resolution options that

may obviate the need for PetSmart’s response.

3

4.

The Parties agreed to the extension requested herein.

4

5.

This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the

5

purpose of delay.

6
7

Therefore, the Parties jointly agree to extend PetSmart’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint to June 8, 2017.

8
9
10

DATED: MAY 19, 2017

DATED: MAY 19, 2017

THE WILCHER FIRM

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

By: /s/ Whitney C. Wilcher
Whitney C. Wilcher
8465 West Sahara Avenue
Suite 111-236
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117

By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove
Kelly H. Dove
Michael Paretti
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

Snell & Wilmer

L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200

11
12
13
14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman

Attorneys for Defendant PetSmart, Inc.

16
17
ORDER

18
19
20

IT IS ORDERED that PetSmart shall respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before June
8, 2017.

21
22
23
24
25

May 23
DATED: __________________, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT OR
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
-2-