Featherston v. Lazer Spot, Inc.

Filing 32

ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond re: 30 Motion for Summary Judgment and to Postpone the Deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order. Responses due by 2/23/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF Document 31 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 GABROY LAW OFFICES Christian Gabroy (#8805) Kaine Messer (#14240) The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway, Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel (702) 259-7777 Fax (702) 259-7704 christian@gabroy.com kmesser@gabroy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 LEPATRICK FEATHERSTON, an individual, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated; Plaintiffs, 11 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 GABROY LAW OFFICES vs. 12 13 14 15 LAZER SPOT, INC., a foreign corporation; EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S) DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XIXX, inclusive, Case No: 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Lepatrick Featherston 18 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc. (“Defendant”) through their respective 19 counsel, to extend the time for Plaintiff to file his Response to Defendant’s Motion for 20 Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) up to and including Friday, February 23, 2018. 21 Such request of twenty-one days is herein made in good faith as Plaintiff’s 22 counsel needs further time for such pleading as Plaintiff’s counsel has work 23 commitments regarding an upcoming class action trial and needs additional time to 24 complete such Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 25 Further, on November 11, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ request to extend 26 certain “Phase 1” discovery deadlines, and entered the parties’ proposed order. (ECF 27 No. 28). Under the terms of the Order, the deadline to file dispositive motions was 28 January 12, 2018, and the deadline to file the joint pretrial order is February 5, 2018. Page 1 of 2 Case 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF Document 31 Filed 01/29/18 Page 2 of 2 1 The Order also provides that the joint pretrial order deadline is applicable only if no 2 dispositive motions are filed. 3 In accordance with the Order, Lazer Spot filed its Motion for Summary Judgment 4 on January 12, 2018. (ECF No. 30). Accordingly, the parties therefore also request that 5 the Court postpone the deadline for the parties to file the joint pretrial order, and reset 6 the deadline after it rules on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. 7 This is the first request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Response to 8 Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This request is made in good faith and not 9 for the purpose of delay. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 (702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704 GABROY LAW OFFICES 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Dated this 29th day of January 2018 Dated this 29th day of January 2018 _/s/ Christian Gabroy_______________ Christian Gabroy (#8805) Kaine Messer (#14240) GABROY LAW OFFICES The District at Green Valley Ranch 170 South Green Valley Parkway, Suite 280 Henderson, Nevada 89012 Tel (702) 259-7777 Fax (702) 259-7704 christian@gabroy.com kmesser@gabroy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff _/s/ Brett Bartlett_______ _________ Brett C. Bartlett (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Jeffrey L. Glaser (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500 Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3958 Tel (404) 885-1500 Fax (404) 892-7056 Attorneys for Defendant 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE or UNITED STATES2018. Dated: January 30, DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 Dated: _____________________________ 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?