Featherston v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond re: 30 Motion for Summary Judgment and to Postpone the Deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order. Responses due by 2/23/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF Document 31 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
GABROY LAW OFFICES
Christian Gabroy (#8805)
Kaine Messer (#14240)
The District at Green Valley Ranch
170 South Green Valley Parkway, Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
Tel
(702) 259-7777
Fax (702) 259-7704
christian@gabroy.com
kmesser@gabroy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
LEPATRICK FEATHERSTON, an
individual, on behalf of himself and all
persons similarly situated;
Plaintiffs,
11
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
(702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704
GABROY LAW OFFICES
vs.
12
13
14
15
LAZER SPOT, INC., a foreign
corporation; EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S)
DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XIXX, inclusive,
Case No: 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
16
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Lepatrick Featherston
18
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc. (“Defendant”) through their respective
19
counsel, to extend the time for Plaintiff to file his Response to Defendant’s Motion for
20
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30) up to and including Friday, February 23, 2018.
21
Such request of twenty-one days is herein made in good faith as Plaintiff’s
22
counsel needs further time for such pleading as Plaintiff’s counsel has work
23
commitments regarding an upcoming class action trial and needs additional time to
24
complete such Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
25
Further, on November 11, 2017, the Court granted the parties’ request to extend
26
certain “Phase 1” discovery deadlines, and entered the parties’ proposed order. (ECF
27
No. 28). Under the terms of the Order, the deadline to file dispositive motions was
28
January 12, 2018, and the deadline to file the joint pretrial order is February 5, 2018.
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF Document 31 Filed 01/29/18 Page 2 of 2
1
The Order also provides that the joint pretrial order deadline is applicable only if no
2
dispositive motions are filed.
3
In accordance with the Order, Lazer Spot filed its Motion for Summary Judgment
4
on January 12, 2018. (ECF No. 30). Accordingly, the parties therefore also request that
5
the Court postpone the deadline for the parties to file the joint pretrial order, and reset
6
the deadline after it rules on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment.
7
This is the first request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file his Response to
8
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This request is made in good faith and not
9
for the purpose of delay.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
170 S. Green Valley Pkwy., Suite 280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
(702) 259-7777 FAX: (702) 259-7704
GABROY LAW OFFICES
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Dated this 29th day of January 2018
Dated this 29th day of January 2018
_/s/ Christian Gabroy_______________
Christian Gabroy (#8805)
Kaine Messer (#14240)
GABROY LAW OFFICES
The District at Green Valley Ranch
170 South Green Valley Parkway, Suite
280
Henderson, Nevada 89012
Tel
(702) 259-7777
Fax (702) 259-7704
christian@gabroy.com
kmesser@gabroy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
_/s/ Brett Bartlett_______ _________
Brett C. Bartlett (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jeffrey L. Glaser (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3958
Tel
(404) 885-1500
Fax (404) 892-7056
Attorneys for Defendant
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE or
UNITED STATES2018.
Dated: January 30, DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
Dated: _____________________________
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?