Angelo et al v. Albertson's LLC
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 9/19/2018. Motions due by 10/19/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:17-cv-01246-APG-GWF Document 19 Filed 06/11/18 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
JOHN B. SHOOK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5499
SHOOK & STONE, CHTD.
710 South 4th Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Office: (702) 385-2220
Attorney for Plaintiffs
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
THOMAS ANGELO, an Individual; and
KAREN ANGELO, an Individual,
Case No.: 2:17-CV-01246-APG-GWF
10
11
Plaintiff,
vs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES
12
13
14
ALBERTSON’S LLC., d/b/a ALBERTSON’S,
a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; and
DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE
BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive,
(Third Request)
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and
19
through their undersigned counsel, that discovery be extended beyond the Discovery Schedule in
20
the Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery dated March 23, 2018 (Document No. 17).
21
22
Per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), and Local Rule 26-4 the following is included in
support of the proposed extension to the Discovery Schedule:
23
24
A.
STATEMENT SPECIFYING THE DISCOVERY THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.
The parties participated in the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference on June 22, 2017. The parties
25
26
27
28
have propounded and responded to written discovery requests including Interrogatories, Request for
Production of Documents and Requests for Admission. The depositions of Plaintiff, Thomas
Angelo and Karen Angelo were completed on October 30, 2017. The deposition of Defendant’s
Case 2:17-cv-01246-APG-GWF Document 19 Filed 06/11/18 Page 2 of 3
1
employee, Kenneth Luoto was completed on June 3, 2018 and the deposition of Defendant’s store
2
manager, Mignon Pasqualicchio was completed on January 19, 2018 and store employee, Lynette
3
Burks on March 27, 2018. The parties disclosed expert reports on February 21, 2018 and the parties
4
disclosed rebuttal expert reports on March 22, 2018. Defendants’ currently have the depositions of
5
Plaintiff’s medical expert, Stuart Kaplan, M.D. scheduled for June 22, 2018, David Silverberg,
6
7
8
M.D. scheduled for June 25, 2018 and Plaintiff’s economist, Stan Smith, Ph.D. scheduled for June
28, 2018.
B.
9
10
11
12
13
14
As set forth above, the parties agree that an extension in the discovery deadlines is necessary
to ensure this case is prepared for trial. Additionally, the parties have agreed to mediation which is
currently scheduled for July 25, 2018. If mediation is unsuccessful both parties will need to
conduct the liability experts’ depositions in addition to an FRCP 30(b)(6) Albertson’s Corporate
Representative deposition.
C.
15
16
17
18
19
20
parties have been compromised in part by the numerous experts that will need to be deposed and
the extent of Plaintiff’s treating physicians. As such, the parties believe that a ninety (90) extension
of the discovery cut off date will be sufficient to allow the parties to complete discovery.
D.
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETING ALL REMAINING DISCOVERY.
It is requested that all remaining discovery deadlines in this case be continued as follows:
22
24
REASONS WHY THE DISCOVERY REMAINING WAS NOT COMPLETED
WITHIN THE DEADLINES CONTAINED IN THE AMENDED DISCOVERY
SCHEDULING ORDER
Despite the parties’ good faith efforts to comply with the Court’s discovery deadlines, both
21
23
SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE
COMPLETED.
1.
Discovery Cut-Off Date: The last day to conduct discovery shall be September 19,
2.
Dispositive Motions: The date for filing dispositive motions shall extended for
2018.
thirty days until October 19, 2018, 30 days after the proposed amended discovery cut-off date. In
the event that the discovery period is again extended from the discovery cut-off date set forth in this
Case 2:17-cv-01246-APG-GWF Document 19 Filed 06/11/18 Page 3 of 3
1
proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, the date for filing dispositive motions shall be
2
extended to be not later than 30 days from the subsequent discovery cut-off date.
3
3.
Pretrial Order: The date for filing the joint pretrial order shall not be later than
4
November 19, 2018, 30 days after the cut-off date for filing dispositive motions. In the event that
5
dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until 30
6
days after decision on the dispositive motions or until further order of the court. In the further event
7
that the discovery period is extended from the discovery cut-off date set forth in this Discovery Plan
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
and Scheduling Order, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be extended in accordance
with the time periods set forth in this paragraph.
4.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures:
The disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P.
26(a)(3), and any objections thereto, shall be included in the joint pretrial order.
5.
Extensions or Modifications of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order: Any
stipulation or motion must be made no later than 21 days before the subject deadline. Requests to
extend discovery deadlines must comply fully with LR 26-4.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DATED this 11th day of June, 2018.
DATED this 11th day of June, 2018.
SHOOK & STONE, CHTD.
BACKUS, CARRANZA & BURDEN
/s/ John Shook, Esq.
/s/ Jack Burden, Esq.
JOHN B. SHOOK, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 5499
710 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-2220
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JACK P. BURDEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6918
XIAO WEN JIN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13901
3050 South Durango Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Attorneys for Defendants
23
ORDER
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED:
DATED this 12thday of June, 2018.
___
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?