Novva Ausrustung Group, Inc. v. Kajioka

Filing 34

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 29 Novva's Motion to Strike is GRANTED with respect to Kajioka's Affirmative Defenses Nos. 6, 7, 21-28, and 36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 29 Novva's Motion to Strike is DENIED with respect to Kajiokas Affirmative Defenses Nos. 4, 5, and 17-20. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 NOVVA AUSTRUTING GROUP, INC., 6 Plaintiff, 2:17-cv-01293-VCF ORDER 7 8 9 vs. DEAN KAJIOKA, Defendant. 10 11 A Report and Recommendation deciding Plaintiff’s motion to strike affirmative defenses 4-7, 17- 12 28, and 36 (ECF No. 29) was filed at 1:58 PM, September 20, 2017. (ECF No. 32). At 4:50 PM, on the 13 same day, Judge Boulware’s Order approving a Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a 14 Magistrate Judge was entered. (ECF No. 33) 15 For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29), 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Novva’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED with 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 respect to Kajioka’s Affirmative Defenses Nos. 6, 7, 21-28, and 36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Novva’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 29) is DENIED with respect to Kajioka’s Affirmative Defenses Nos. 4, 5, and 17-20. DATED this 21st day of September, 2017. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?