Novva Ausrustung Group, Inc. v. Kajioka
Filing
34
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 29 Novva's Motion to Strike is GRANTED with respect to Kajioka's Affirmative Defenses Nos. 6, 7, 21-28, and 36. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 29 Novva's Motion to Strike is DENIED with respect to Kajiokas Affirmative Defenses Nos. 4, 5, and 17-20. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
5
NOVVA AUSTRUTING GROUP, INC.,
6
Plaintiff,
2:17-cv-01293-VCF
ORDER
7
8
9
vs.
DEAN KAJIOKA,
Defendant.
10
11
A Report and Recommendation deciding Plaintiff’s motion to strike affirmative defenses 4-7, 17-
12
28, and 36 (ECF No. 29) was filed at 1:58 PM, September 20, 2017. (ECF No. 32). At 4:50 PM, on the
13
same day, Judge Boulware’s Order approving a Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a
14
Magistrate Judge was entered. (ECF No. 33)
15
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29),
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Novva’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED with
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
respect to Kajioka’s Affirmative Defenses Nos. 6, 7, 21-28, and 36.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Novva’s Motion to Strike (ECF No. 29) is DENIED with respect
to Kajioka’s Affirmative Defenses Nos. 4, 5, and 17-20.
DATED this 21st day of September, 2017.
_________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?