Love v. State of Nevada
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Recommending 1 Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 7/25/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WILSON EARL LOVE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No. 2:17-cv-01317-RFB-CWH
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff submitted an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and a
10
11
Complaint on May 9, 2017. On May 15, 2017, this Court denied (ECF No. 5) Plaintiff’s application,
12
and gave Plaintiff a deadline to either pay the filing fee or file a renewed application to proceed in
13
forma pauperis. On June 9, 2017, the Court ordered (ECF No. 7) an extension to Plaintiff’s deadline
14
until July 8, 2017.
15
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil
16
action in federal district court. The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without
17
prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who makes affidavit that he is unable
18
to pay such costs or give security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff was notified that failure
19
to comply with the Court’s Order to pay the filing fee or submit a renewed application to proceed in
20
forma pauperis would result in the Court recommending dismissal of the action.
21
More than thirty days have elapsed since the Court’s Order and Plaintiff has not submitted
22
the filing fee or a renewed application.
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
1
1
RECOMMENDATION
2
IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be
3
dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee within 30 days of the Court’s
4
Order.
5
6
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s pending motion to join (ECF No. 9) be
denied as moot.
7
NOTICE
8
This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to
9
this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may
10
file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with
11
this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive
12
the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).
13
DATED: July 11, 2017
14
15
_________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?