U.S. Bank, National Association, et al v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al

Filing 59

ORDER Granting 58 Stipulation To Extend Time Re: 46 Motion for Summary Judgment, 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Case 2:17-cv-01319-JCM-GWF Document 58 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
Cynthia L. Alexander, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6718
Email: [e-mail]
Taylor Anello, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12881
Email: [e-mail]
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs U.S. Bank, National Association,
as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.

8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Trustee for GSAA2006-1, an Ohio
Company; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.,
a Virginia Corporation
Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20

v.
SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; SAN MARINO
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a
Nevada non-profit corporation
Defendants.

) CASE NO.: 2:17 cv-01319-JCM-GWF
)
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
)
TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO
)
DEFENDANT SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1,
)
LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
)
JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT SFR
)
INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC’S
)
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’
)
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
)
(First Request)
)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR 7-1, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank,
National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”)
through undersigned counsel, the law firm of Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Defendant SFR
Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) through undersigned counsel, the law firm of Kim Gilbert
Ebron, and Defendant San Marino Property Owners Association (“San Marino”), the law firm
Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin PC hereby agree and stipulate to extend the deadline to
file responses to SFR’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] and the Plaintiff’s
-1-

Case 2:17-cv-01319-JCM-GWF Document 58 Filed 09/14/18 Page 2 of 3

1

Response to SFR’s Opposition its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] because the

2

parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions. This is the first request to extend the

3

foregoing deadlines.

4

1. On June 8, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No.

5

46].

6

2. On June 29, 2018, a Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Responses to

7

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and San Marino Property Owners

8

Association’s Motion For Summary Judgment (First Request) [ECF No. 51] was

9

entered by the Court extending the time for filing responses from June 29, 2018, to

10

September 6, 2018, to allow the Parties to fully address the issues in this case.

11

3. On September 6, 2018, SFR filed their Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for

12

Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 55].

13

4. On September 6, 2018, SFR filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No.

14

54].

15

5. Plaintiffs’ Response to SFR’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary

16

Judgment [ECF No. 55] is currently due on September 21, 2018. The Parties have

17

agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Response to SFR’s Opposition to

18

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] to October 5, 2018.

19

6. The Response to SFR’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] is currently

20

due on September 27, 2018. The Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for

21

Plaintiffs to respond to SFR’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] to

22

October 11, 2018.

23

This is the first request for an enlargement of time is not made for any deleterious purpose

24

or to cause delay, but is made in good faith by the Parties and in the interests of efficiency and

25

judicial economy.

26

additional time to file the foregoing responses to facilitate those settlement discussions.

27

///

28

///

The parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions and request

-2-

Case 2:17-cv-01319-JCM-GWF Document 58 Filed 09/14/18 Page 3 of 3

1

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline

2

for Plaintiffs to file their response to SFR’s Opposition to its Motion for Summary Judgment

3

[ECF No. 46] shall be extended to October 5, 2018 and the deadline for Plaintiffs’ to file their

4

response to SFR’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] shall be extended to October

5

11, 2018.

6

Dated September 14, 2018

7

DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC

8

By: _/s/ Cynthia Alexander_________________
Cynthia L. Alexander, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6718
Taylor Anello, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12881
8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89113-2210
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs U.S. Bank, National
Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1
and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.

9
10
11
12
13
14

Dated September 14, 2018
Kim Gilbert Ebron
By: _/s/ Diana Ebron___________________
Diana S. Ebron
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant SFR Investments
Pool 1, LLC

15
Dated September 14, 2018
16
Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin PC
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

By: __/s/ Karen Kao______________________
J. William Ebert
Nevada Bar No. 2697
Karen Kao
Nevada Bar No. 14386
9900 Covington Cross Dr., Ste. 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144
702-382-1500
Attorneys for Defendant San Marino
Property Owners Association
IT IS SO ORDERED:

25
26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28

DATED: September 19, 2018
LVEGAS 55969-24 247538v1

-3-