U.S. Bank, National Association, et al v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, et al
Filing
71
ORDER Denying without prejudice 45 , 46 , and 54 Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
8
9
10
Case No. 2:17-CV-1319 JCM (GWF)
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER
v.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, et al.,
11
Defendant(s).
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Presently before the court is defendant San Marino Property Owners Association’s (“San
Marino”) motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 45).
Also before the court is plaintiff SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (“SunTrust”) and U.S. Bank,
National Association’s (“U.S. Bank”) motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 46).
Also before the court is defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC’s (“SFR”) motion for
summary judgment. (ECF No. 54).
19
On October 5, 2018, U.S. Bank filed a notice of settlement. (ECF No. 62). Thereafter, the
20
parties filed four stipulations to extend time to complete the settlement agreement. (ECF Nos. 63,
21
65, 67, 69). Accordingly, the court will deny without prejudice the pending motions subject to the
22
parties’ ability to renew their motions should the settlement not materialize.
23
Accordingly,
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that San Marino’s motion for
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
summary judgment (ECF No. 45) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SunTrust and U.S. Bank’s motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 46) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
1
2
3
4
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No 54) be,
and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
DATED February 6, 2019.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?