Garcia v. Service Employees International Union et al

Filing 98

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 60 the plaintiffs' motion to amend and 66 the defendants' motion for leave to file a sur-reply are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 94 the parties' stipulation is GRANTED in that the defendants' response to 92 the plaintiffs' motion to amend is due 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4
5
6
7

RAYMOND GARCIA, as a member, and on
behalf of CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION; CLARK
COUNTY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION dba NEVADA SERVICE
EMPLOYEES UNION aka SEIU 1107, a nonprofit cooperative corporation,

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK
Consolidated with: 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
AND MOTIONS TO AMEND
(ECF Nos. 60, 66, 94 in 2:17-cv-01340-APGNJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APGNJK)

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, a nonprofit cooperative corporation;
LUISA BLUE, in her official capacity as
trustee; MARY K. HENRY, in her official
capacity as Union President; EXECUTIVE
BOARD OF THE NEVADA SERVICE
EMPLOYEES UNION, in official capacity;
STEVE URY, individually; DOES; and ROE
CORPORATIONS 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17

Prior to these two cases being consolidated, the plaintiffs filed motions to amend in each

18

of the separate cases. Following consolidation, the plaintiffs again move to amend. The parties

19

filed a stipulation to extend the defendants’ time to respond to this latest motion pending a ruling

20

from me as to whether the latest motion to amend renders the prior motions moot.

21

The plaintiffs’ motion to amend following consolidation renders its prior motions to

22

amend moot. I therefore deny those motions, along with a related motion for leave to file a sur-

23

reply. I grant the parties’ stipulation to extend the defendants’ deadline to respond to the motion

24

to amend to 14 days from the date of this order.

25

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motions to amend (ECF No. 60 in

26

2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK and ECF No. 24 in 2:17-cv-02137-APG-NJK) and the defendants’

27

motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 66) are DENIED as moot.

28

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 94) is GRANTED in

2

that the defendants’ response to the plaintiffs’ motion to amend (ECF No. 92) is due 14 days from

3

the date of this order.

4

Dated: December 1, 2017.

5
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2