Schmitt v. Berryhill
Filing
8
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE 1 -1 the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel for the Commissioner shall file a statement with the court by 8/11/17, indicating whether the Commissioner acknowledges effective service, has any claim regarding service, or deems the attempted service not effective. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
ROBERT KENT SCHMITT,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 2:17-cv-01349-RFB-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
12
13
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Robert Kent Schmitt’s Receipt of Payment (ECF
14
No. 7). On June 21, 2017, the court entered an Order (ECF No. 6) denying Schmitt’s Application
15
to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) without prejudice. The court gave Mr. Schmitt until
16
July 6, 2017, to: (i) file the long form in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application, or (ii) pay the $400.00
17
filing fee. He opted to pay the filing fee.
18
On May 19, 2017, a Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 3) was filed by Special Assistant
19
United States Attorney Michael Marriott indicating that he will be appearing as counsel of record
20
in this case. However, summons has not been issued, there is no proof of service of complaint and
21
summons on file, and the notice of appearance does not indicate that the Commissioner has been
22
served, or waived service. Mr. Schmidt filed a letter which the clerk docketed as an Affidavit of
23
Service (ECF No. 4) indicating that he sent “service letters of Complaint” to Defendant, the United
24
States Attorney for the District of Nevada, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
25
Accordingly,
26
IT IS ORDERED:
27
1. The Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1).
28
1
1
2. Counsel for the Commissioner shall file a statement with the court by August 11, 2017,
2
indicating whether the Commissioner acknowledges effective service, has any claim
3
regarding service, or deems the attempted service not effective.
4
3. From this point forward, Mr. Schmitt shall serve upon counsel for the Commissioner a
5
copy of every pleading, motion, or other document filed with the Clerk of the Court
6
pursuant to LR IC 1-1 and 4-1 of the Local Rules of Practice. In accordance with LR
7
IC 4-1(d), the parties shall include with each filing a certificate of service stating that a
8
true and correct copy of the document was served on an opposing party or counsel for
9
an opposing party and indicating how service was accomplished. The court may
10
disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been
11
filed with the Clerk of the Court, and any paper received by a district judge, magistrate
12
judge, or the Clerk of the Court that fails to include a certificate of service.
13
4. Following the Defendant’s filing of an answer, the court will issue a scheduling order
14
setting a briefing schedule.
15
Dated this 12th day of July, 2017.
16
17
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?