Schmitt v. Berryhill

Filing 8

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE 1 -1 the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel for the Commissioner shall file a statement with the court by 8/11/17, indicating whether the Commissioner acknowledges effective service, has any claim regarding service, or deems the attempted service not effective. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 ROBERT KENT SCHMITT, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 2:17-cv-01349-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, ORDER v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 12 13 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Robert Kent Schmitt’s Receipt of Payment (ECF 14 No. 7). On June 21, 2017, the court entered an Order (ECF No. 6) denying Schmitt’s Application 15 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) without prejudice. The court gave Mr. Schmitt until 16 July 6, 2017, to: (i) file the long form in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application, or (ii) pay the $400.00 17 filing fee. He opted to pay the filing fee. 18 On May 19, 2017, a Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 3) was filed by Special Assistant 19 United States Attorney Michael Marriott indicating that he will be appearing as counsel of record 20 in this case. However, summons has not been issued, there is no proof of service of complaint and 21 summons on file, and the notice of appearance does not indicate that the Commissioner has been 22 served, or waived service. Mr. Schmidt filed a letter which the clerk docketed as an Affidavit of 23 Service (ECF No. 4) indicating that he sent “service letters of Complaint” to Defendant, the United 24 States Attorney for the District of Nevada, and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. 25 Accordingly, 26 IT IS ORDERED: 27 1. The Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). 28 1 1 2. Counsel for the Commissioner shall file a statement with the court by August 11, 2017, 2 indicating whether the Commissioner acknowledges effective service, has any claim 3 regarding service, or deems the attempted service not effective. 4 3. From this point forward, Mr. Schmitt shall serve upon counsel for the Commissioner a 5 copy of every pleading, motion, or other document filed with the Clerk of the Court 6 pursuant to LR IC 1-1 and 4-1 of the Local Rules of Practice. In accordance with LR 7 IC 4-1(d), the parties shall include with each filing a certificate of service stating that a 8 true and correct copy of the document was served on an opposing party or counsel for 9 an opposing party and indicating how service was accomplished. The court may 10 disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been 11 filed with the Clerk of the Court, and any paper received by a district judge, magistrate 12 judge, or the Clerk of the Court that fails to include a certificate of service. 13 4. Following the Defendant’s filing of an answer, the court will issue a scheduling order 14 setting a briefing schedule. 15 Dated this 12th day of July, 2017. 16 17 PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?