U.S. Bank National Association v. Ou et al
Filing
46
ORDER Granting 45 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 35 , 36 , and 36 Motions for Summary Judgment. Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association's Replies due by 11/22/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ASHLIE L. SURUR, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11290
asurur@lawhjc.com
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP
7425 Peak Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
(702) 316-4111
Fax (702) 316-4114
Attorneys for Arlington West
Twilight Homeowners Association
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS Case No.: 2:17-cv-01354-APG-EJY
TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT
OF THE HOLDERS OF BAYVIEW
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND IVA
DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING
REMIC TRUST 2016-17NPL3 BENEFICIAL
SECOND REQUEST
INTEREST CERTIFICATES, SERIES 201617NPL3,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
15
16
17
ZILIAN OU; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1,
LLC; ARLINGTON WEST TWILIGHT
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; DOW
INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive, and ROE
CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive,
18
Defendants.
19
20
The parties, by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:
21
1.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) filed its Motion for Summary
Judgment on October 9, 2019 [ECF No. 35].
2.
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment
October 9, 2019 [ECF No. 36].
3.
Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association (“Arlington”) filed its
Motion for Summary Judgment on October 10, 2019 [ECF No. 37].
4.
On October 30, 2019, the parties obtained their first extension of the deadline to
respond to all three motions for summary judgment [ECF No. 41].
1
1
5.
The opposition deadlines were extended to December 13, 2019. ECF No. 41.
2
6.
U.S. Bank filed its response to Arlington’s Motion for Summary Judgment on
3
October 31, 2019 [ECF Nos. 42 and 43] – a date before the extended December 13, 2019
4
opposition deadline.
5
6
7.
Based on the date U.S. Bank filed its response to Arlington’s motion for
summary judgment [ECF No. 37], the reply is due November 14, 2019.
7
8.
There is good cause to extend the reply deadline for Arlington’s motion for
8
summary judgment by one week or to November 22, 2019, because (1) counsel for Arlington
9
was preparing for a two-week trial in state court set to begin November 12, 2019. Although
10
counsel for Arlington settled her portion of that case on November 11, 2019, Arlington
11
requires additional time to prepare its reply.
12
///
13
///
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
1
9.
Therefore, the parties agree that there is good cause to extend the reply deadline
2
for Arlington’s motion for summary judgment to November 22, 2019. The requested extension
3
is limited and will not unduly delay resolution of this matter.
4
Dated: November 14, 2019.
Dated: November 14, 2019.
5
HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP
AKERMAN, LLP
6
By: /s/Ashlie L. Surur
Ashlie L. Surur, Esq.
Nevada Bar No.11290
7425 Peak Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Attorneys for Arlington West
Twilight Homeowners Association
By: /s/ Tenesa S. Powell
Natalie L. Winslow, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12125
Tenesa S. Powell, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12488
1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
Attorneys for U.S. Bank National Association
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: November 14, 2019.
KIM GILBERT EBRON
By: /s/ Diana S. Ebron
Diana S. Ebron, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1,
LLC
19
ORDER
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
DATED:
22
23
24
______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 15, 2019.
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?