U.S. Bank National Association v. Ou et al

Filing 46

ORDER Granting 45 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 35 , 36 , and 36 Motions for Summary Judgment. Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association's Replies due by 11/22/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ASHLIE L. SURUR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11290 asurur@lawhjc.com HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 (702) 316-4111 Fax (702) 316-4114 Attorneys for Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS Case No.: 2:17-cv-01354-APG-EJY TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE HOLDERS OF BAYVIEW STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND IVA DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING REMIC TRUST 2016-17NPL3 BENEFICIAL SECOND REQUEST INTEREST CERTIFICATES, SERIES 201617NPL3, Plaintiff, ORDER vs. 15 16 17 ZILIAN OU; SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; ARLINGTON WEST TWILIGHT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; DOW INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 The parties, by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 21 1. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on October 9, 2019 [ECF No. 35]. 2. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment October 9, 2019 [ECF No. 36]. 3. Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association (“Arlington”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on October 10, 2019 [ECF No. 37]. 4. On October 30, 2019, the parties obtained their first extension of the deadline to respond to all three motions for summary judgment [ECF No. 41]. 1 1 5. The opposition deadlines were extended to December 13, 2019. ECF No. 41. 2 6. U.S. Bank filed its response to Arlington’s Motion for Summary Judgment on 3 October 31, 2019 [ECF Nos. 42 and 43] – a date before the extended December 13, 2019 4 opposition deadline. 5 6 7. Based on the date U.S. Bank filed its response to Arlington’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 37], the reply is due November 14, 2019. 7 8. There is good cause to extend the reply deadline for Arlington’s motion for 8 summary judgment by one week or to November 22, 2019, because (1) counsel for Arlington 9 was preparing for a two-week trial in state court set to begin November 12, 2019. Although 10 counsel for Arlington settled her portion of that case on November 11, 2019, Arlington 11 requires additional time to prepare its reply. 12 /// 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 9. Therefore, the parties agree that there is good cause to extend the reply deadline 2 for Arlington’s motion for summary judgment to November 22, 2019. The requested extension 3 is limited and will not unduly delay resolution of this matter. 4 Dated: November 14, 2019. Dated: November 14, 2019. 5 HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP AKERMAN, LLP 6 By: /s/Ashlie L. Surur Ashlie L. Surur, Esq. Nevada Bar No.11290 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 Attorneys for Arlington West Twilight Homeowners Association By: /s/ Tenesa S. Powell Natalie L. Winslow, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12125 Tenesa S. Powell, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12488 1635 Village Center Circle, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 Attorneys for U.S. Bank National Association 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: November 14, 2019. KIM GILBERT EBRON By: /s/ Diana S. Ebron Diana S. Ebron, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10580 Jacqueline A. Gilbert, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10593 Karen L. Hanks, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9578 7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110 Las Vegas, Nevada 89139 Attorneys for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC 19 ORDER 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 DATED: 22 23 24 ______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 15, 2019. 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?