Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest et al
Filing
44
ORDER Granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time re 36 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Richard C. Gordon
Nevada Bar No. 9036
Tanya N. Lewis
Nevada Bar No. 8855
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702.784.5200
Facsimile: 702.784.5252
Email: rgordon@swlaw.com
tlewis@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-1360-APG-VCF
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
15
16
17
18
19
SATICOY BAY LLC – SERIES 3948
APPLECREST, a Nevada limited-liability
company; WOODCREST HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; a Nevada non-profit
corporation; ABSOLUTE COLLECTION
SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability
company; DOES 1 through 10; and ROE
BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 through 10, inclusive,
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO SATICOY BAY. LLC’S
COUNTER CLAIM
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
20
21
Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) by and through its counsel, the law firm
22
of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. and Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest (“Saticoy Bay”),
23
by and through their respective counsel (collectively the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree to
24
extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Saticoy Bay’s Counterclaim [ECF Doc. 36]
25
(“Counterclaim”). The Counterclaim was filed June 13, 2019. The deadline for response is
26
currently July 5, 2019.
27
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requires an additional short extension of time to review the
Counterclaim and related documents and evaluate the arguments therein;
1
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested, and Saticoy Bay agreed, to extend the time for Plaintiff
to respond; and
3
WHEREAS, this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause.
4
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS
5
HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, as follows:
6
1.
7
Dated: June 28, 2019
8
Plaintiff shall have until July 19, 2019 to respond to the Counterclaim.
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ., LTD.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
/s/ Adam R. Trippiedi
Michael F. Bohn
Adam R. Trippiedi
Nikoll Nikci
2260 Corporate Circle, Suite 480
Henderson, NV 89074
/s/ Tanya N. Lewis
Richard C. Gordon
Tanya N. Lewis
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
.
.
Attorneys for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank,
3948 Applecrest
N.A.
*e-signature affixed with permission
16
ORDER
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
20
______________________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
7-1-2019
Dated: _______________________________
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the foregoing STIPULATION
3
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SATICOY
4
BAY, LLC’S COUNTER CLAIM with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of
5
Nevada by using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to
6
all counsel in this matter; all counsel being registered to receive Electronic Filing.
7
DATED: June 28, 2019
8
9
10
/s/ Susan Ballif
An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
4817-6315-5611
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?