Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest et al

Filing 44

ORDER Granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time re 36 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Richard C. Gordon Nevada Bar No. 9036 Tanya N. Lewis Nevada Bar No. 8855 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.784.5200 Facsimile: 702.784.5252 Email: rgordon@swlaw.com tlewis@swlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Case No. 2:17-cv-1360-APG-VCF 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 SATICOY BAY LLC – SERIES 3948 APPLECREST, a Nevada limited-liability company; WOODCREST HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; a Nevada non-profit corporation; ABSOLUTE COLLECTION SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company; DOES 1 through 10; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 through 10, inclusive, STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SATICOY BAY. LLC’S COUNTER CLAIM (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) by and through its counsel, the law firm 22 of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. and Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series 3948 Applecrest (“Saticoy Bay”), 23 by and through their respective counsel (collectively the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree to 24 extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Saticoy Bay’s Counterclaim [ECF Doc. 36] 25 (“Counterclaim”). The Counterclaim was filed June 13, 2019. The deadline for response is 26 currently July 5, 2019. 27 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiff requires an additional short extension of time to review the Counterclaim and related documents and evaluate the arguments therein; 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs requested, and Saticoy Bay agreed, to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond; and 3 WHEREAS, this request is not made for purposes of delay and is supported by good cause. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause, IT IS 5 HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, as follows: 6 1. 7 Dated: June 28, 2019 8 Plaintiff shall have until July 19, 2019 to respond to the Counterclaim. LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL F. BOHN, ESQ., LTD. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. /s/ Adam R. Trippiedi Michael F. Bohn Adam R. Trippiedi Nikoll Nikci 2260 Corporate Circle, Suite 480 Henderson, NV 89074 /s/ Tanya N. Lewis Richard C. Gordon Tanya N. Lewis 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 9 10 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 12 13 14 15 . . Attorneys for Defendant Saticoy Bay LLC Series Attorneys for Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, 3948 Applecrest N.A. *e-signature affixed with permission 16 ORDER 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 ______________________________________ United States Magistrate Judge 7-1-2019 Dated: _______________________________ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the foregoing STIPULATION 3 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SATICOY 4 BAY, LLC’S COUNTER CLAIM with the Clerk of Court for the U.S. District Court, District of 5 Nevada by using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to 6 all counsel in this matter; all counsel being registered to receive Electronic Filing. 7 DATED: June 28, 2019 8 9 10 /s/ Susan Ballif An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 4817-6315-5611 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nev ada 89169 702.784 .5200 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?