Acrylic Tank Manufacturing, Inc. v. Powervision Robot Corporation

Filing 52

ORDER Granting 50 Joint Stipulation to Stay All Case Deadlines. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

JONES LOVELOCK
400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500
Las Vegas, NV89101

1 Nicole Lovelock, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 11187
2 Justin C. Jones, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 8519
3 JONES LOVELOCK
400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500
4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
6 Email: [e-mail]
7 Jo Dale Carothers (admitted pro hac vice)
California State Bar No. 228703
8 Arizona State Bar No. 020402
Eric Caligiuri (admitted pro hac vice)
9 California State Bar No. 260442
WEINTRAUB TOBIN
10 11682 El Camino Real, Suite 305
San Diego, CA 92130
11 Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
12
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
13 PowerVision Robot Corporation
14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17 ACRYLIC TANK MANUFACTURING,
INC., a Nevada Corporation,
18
Plaintiff,
19
vs.
20
POWERVISION ROBOT CORPORATION, a
21 Delaware Corporation,
22

Defendant.

23 POWERVISION ROBOT CORPORATION, a
Delaware Corporation,
24
Counterclaimant,
25 vs.
26 ACRYLIC TANK MANUFACTURING,
INC., a Nevada Corporation,
27
Counter-defendant.
28

CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-01370-JCM-PAL

JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY ALL
CASE DEADLINES AND ORDER
THEREON

1

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Acrylic Tank Manufacturing, Inc. (“ATM”), by and through its

2 counsel of record, Jack Chen Min Juan, Esq., and James A. Beckstrom, Esq. of the law firm of
3 Marquis Aurbach Coffing and Lance A. Maningo, Esq. of the law firm of Maningo Law and
4 Defendant/Counterclaimant, PowerVision Robot Corporation (“PowerVision”) by and through its
5 counsel of record Jo Dale Carothers, Esq., and Eric Caligiuri, Esq. of the law firm of Weintraub
6 Tobin and Nicole Lovelock, Esq. of the law firm of Jones Lovelock (collectively, the “Parties”)
7 hereby submit this Joint Stipulation To Stay of All Case Deadlines.
8

The Parties hereby jointly notify the Court that the Parties have reached a settlement in

9 principle and accordingly request that the Court stay all current case deadlines in order to allow the
10 Parties to focus on executing the settlement agreement and comply with the agreement’s
11 requirements. “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to
JONES LOVELOCK
400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500
Las Vegas, NV89101

12 control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for
13 counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254, 57 S. Ct. 163 (1936).
14 / / /
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

The Parties intend to complete settlement and file a joint stipulation of dismissal with

2 prejudice within thirty (30) days. For good cause shown, the parties respectfully request the Court
3 grant this request.
4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

DATED this 25th day of September 2018.

DATED this 25th day of September 2018.

/s/ James A. Beckstrom, Esq.
Jack Chen Min Juan, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 6367
James A. Beckstrom, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14032
Rachel S. Tygret, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 14120
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145

/s/ Nicole E. Lovelock, Esq.
Nicole Lovelock, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 11187
Justin C. Jones, Esq.
Nevada State Bar No. 8519
JONES LOVELOCK
400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Jo Dale Carothers (admitted pro hac vice)
California State Bar No. 228703
Arizona State Bar No. 020402
Eric Caligiuri (admitted pro hac vice)
California State Bar No. 260442
WEINTRAUB TOBIN
11682 El Camino Real, Suite 305
San Diego, CA 92130

JONES LOVELOCK
400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500
Las Vegas, NV89101

12

Lance A. Maningo, Esq.
13 Nevada State Bar No. 6405
MANINGO LAW
th
14 400 South 4 St., Suite 650
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
16 Acrylic Tank Manufacturing, Inc.

Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
PowerVision Robot Corporation

17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED:
______________________________________
US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
September 27, 2018
Dated:___________________________

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3