LV Diagnostics, LLC v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al
Filing
35
ORDER that 33 Stipulation to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 34 Motion for a Settlement Conference is DENIED. The deadline for filing dispositive motions has expired and the deadline to file the joint pretri al order is August 29, 2018. A mandatory settlement conference will be set on the court's first available date once the joint pretrial order is filed, a trial date set, and the district judge refers it for a settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
LV DIAGNOSTICS, LLC,
8
9
10
11
v.
HARTFORD
FINANCIAL
GROUP, INC., et al.,
Case No. 2:17-cv-01371-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
ORDER
(Stip Ext Time – ECF No. 33)
(Jt. Mot SC – ECF No. 34)
SERVICES
Defendants.
12
Before the court is the parties’ untimely filed Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend
13
Dispositive Motion Deadline (ECF No. 33) filed July 26, 2018. The deadline to file dispositive
14
motions expired on July 30, 2018. The stipulation was not submitted 21 days before the expiration
15
of the deadline. The parties request a 90-day extension “because they are trying to resolve this
16
matter with a settlement” and the additional time will allow the parties to complete a mediation or
17
settlement conference without incurring additional costs.”
18
On August 3, 2018 the parties filed a joint motion (ECF No. 34) requesting a settlement
19
conference before a district court judge. The district judges do not conduct settlement conferences
20
in this district. Most of the district judges, including Judge Mahan, automatically refer cases to the
21
assigned magistrate judge for a mandatory settlement conference after dispositive motions are
22
decided and the joint pretrial order is filed.
23
In an Order (ECF No. 29) entered April 6, 2018 the court granted the parties’ stipulation
24
(ECF No 28) requesting a third extension of the discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines
25
indicating no further extension would be allowed. The third extension gave the parties until June
26
28th to complete discovery, July 30, 2018 to file dispositive motions, and August 29, 2018 to file
27
the joint pretrial order as the parties requested. The parties then filed an untimely stipulation
28
requesting a fourth extension July 23, 2018 requesting an additional 60-day extension which the
1
1
court denied because the court’s prior order (ECF No. 29) specifically stated that no further
2
extensions would be allowed. The parties have repeatedly filed untimely stipulations to extend
3
the discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines and have not shown either good cause or
4
excusable neglect for failing to comply with court imposed deadlines. The stipulations and joint
5
motion are therefore denied.
6
The parties are free to attempt to settle the case before the deadline for filing the joint
7
pretrial order. A mandatory settlement conference will be set on the court’s first available date
8
once the joint pretrial order is filed.
9
Having reviewed and considered the matter,
10
IT IS ORDERED that:
11
1. The parties’ Stipulation to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (ECF No. 33) is
12
DENIED.
13
2. The parties’ Joint Motion for a Settlement Conference (ECF No 34) is DENIED.
14
3. The deadline for filing dispositive motions has expired and the deadline to file the joint
15
pretrial order is August 29, 2018. A mandatory settlement conference will be set on
16
the court’s first available date once the joint pretrial order is filed, a trial date set, and
17
the district judge refers it for a settlement conference.
18
DATED this 10th day of August, 2018.
19
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?