Cecich v. Chase Mortgage et al
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Chase Mortgage. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:17-cv-01379-APG-VCF Document 25 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Phone: (702) 880-5554
FAX: (702) 385-5518
Email: dkrieger@hainesandkrieger.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, DANIELLE CECICH
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
DANIELLE CECICH,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
CHASE MORTGAGE; WELLS
FARGO CARD SERVICES;
EQUIFAX INFORMATION
SERVICES, LLC,
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-01379-APG-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER
DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO CHASE
MORTGAGE ONLY
17
Plaintiff DANIELLE CECICH and Defendant CHASE MORTGAGE a/k/a/
18
19
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. hereby stipulate and agree that the above-entitled
20
…
21
22
…
…
…
23
…
24
…
25
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:17-cv-01379-APG-VCF Document 25 Filed 11/16/17 Page 2 of 2
1
action shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41
2
(a)(2) as to, and ONLY as to, CHASE MORTGAGE. Each party shall bear its
3
own attorney's fees, and costs of suit.
4
Dated:
November 15, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
By:
/s/David H. Krieger, Esq.
David H. Krieger, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9086
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
8985 S. Eastern Avenue
Suite 350
Henderson, Nevada 89123
Attorney for Plaintiff
DANIELLE CECICH
By:
/s/ Lindsay C. Demaree, Esq.
Lindsay C. Demaree, Esq.
Ballard Spahr LLP
100 North City Parkway
Suite 1750
Las Vegas, NV 89106-4617
Attorney for Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
improperly named as Chase Mortgage
14
15
16
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED
17
18
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
11/16/2017
DATED: ____________________
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?