W.W. Williams Company, LLC v. Reza et al

Filing 43

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit, within three (3) days of the entry of this order, a proposed preliminary injunction order consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 41 , 42 plaintiff's proposed preliminary injunction orders be, and the same hereby are, STRICKEN. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 THE W.W. WILLIAMS COMPANY, LLC, 8 9 10 Case No. 2:17-CV-1410 JCM (PAL) Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. JOSEPH REZA, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 14 Presently before the court is plaintiff W.W. Williams, LLC’s proposed order granting preliminary injunction. (ECF Nos. 41, 42). 15 The court finds that plaintiff’s proposed order is contrary to the court’s orders during the 16 preliminary injunction hearing because it includes broad language and overly restricts defendants’ 17 business. (See ECF No. 42). 18 Plaintiff’s proposal alters the original temporary restraining order language in two 19 significant ways: (1) removing “confidential” from clause three so that the proposal now includes 20 all information related to plaintiff’s business; and (2) adding clause five and six which overly 21 restrict defendants’ business. (See ECF No. 42-1 at 3). 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Plaintiff shall submit an amended proposed order curing these deficiencies. In particular, plaintiff shall strike clauses (5) and (6) and edit clause (3) and (4) to read as follows: (3) using or disclosing plaintiff’s property, confidential information, or any reproduction or copy of the same in any format; (4) transferring, moving, returning, destroying or otherwise disposing of any of plaintiff’s confidential information, property, or any reproduction or copy of the same in any format in their possession; 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit, within three (3) days of the entry 3 4 5 6 7 8 of this order, a proposed preliminary injunction order consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s proposed preliminary injunction orders (ECF Nos. 41, 42) be, and the same hereby are, STRICKEN. DATED June 20, 2017. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?