Godifay v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule. Motions due by 12/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
Cyrus Safa
Attorney at Law: 13241
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-5491
E-mail cyrus.safa@rohlfinglaw.com
5
6
7
8
9
Gerald M. Welt
Attorney at Law: 1575
703 S. Eight St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Tel.: (702)382-2030
Fax: (702)684-5157
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HAILESLASSIE GODIFAY
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
HAILESLASSIE GODIFAY
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security.
19
Defendant.
20
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH
)
) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
21
22
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to
24
25
and include December 29, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment and/or remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the November 1,
26
27
28
-1-
Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2017 Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO
2
ORDERED.
3
DATE December 1, 2017
4
_______________________________
THE HONORABLE CARL W. HOFFMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 3 of 3
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
3
4
5
/s/Cyrus Safa
BY: _________________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorney for plaintiff
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?