Godifay v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation Extending Briefing Schedule. Motions due by 12/29/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 Cyrus Safa Attorney at Law: 13241 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-5491 E-mail cyrus.safa@rohlfinglaw.com 5 6 7 8 9 Gerald M. Welt Attorney at Law: 1575 703 S. Eight St. Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel.: (702)382-2030 Fax: (702)684-5157 Attorneys for Plaintiff HAILESLASSIE GODIFAY 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 HAILESLASSIE GODIFAY 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. 19 Defendant. 20 ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH ) ) │PROPOSED│ ORDER EXTENDING ) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21 22 Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, to 24 25 and include December 29, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and/or remand; and that all other deadlines set forth in the November 1, 26 27 28 -1- Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 2 of 3 1 2017 Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly. IT IS SO 2 ORDERED. 3 DATE December 1, 2017 4 _______________________________ THE HONORABLE CARL W. HOFFMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case 2:17-cv-01433-JAD-CWH Document 20-1 Filed 11/30/17 Page 3 of 3 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing 3 4 5 /s/Cyrus Safa BY: _________________________ Cyrus Safa Attorney for plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?